A review of the device history record confirmed that the device was manufactured and tested according to relevant procedures, and shipped according to manufacturer's specifications.Patient#: (b)(6) index surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2022.Patient x-rays taken in on (b)(6) 2022 showed that the t5 polyaxial screw had begun to migrate (pull-out) resulting in an exaggerated kite angle.Although no revision date had been set as of yet, the family is against a fusion at all costs even with a stiff curve that won't bend out much under 30 degrees.Apifix clinical affairs reviewed all the available information and noted: the surgery plan stated: "while the case does ultimately meet all of the fda criteria summarized above, the patient is at the high end of all objective measures: 60-degree primary curve, only bends to 27 degrees, significant wedging of vertebrae around the apex, etc.However, patient is risser 0 and may do well with ideal screw placement and maximal intraoperative correction." - measurements and comments from geoff haft, md review of the patient's inter-op x-rays demonstrated that the extender wasn't positioned per the company's surgical technique (the patient extender angle was measured at 22°; the surgical technique states that the extender angle should be 5-15° compared to the mid-c rod).The extender misalignment eventually lead to the screw pulling out as the extender angle continued to progress.The company's incident rate of extender misalignment is (b)(4).The risk of "extender and mid-c system not properly aligned" has been assessed and found to be acceptable.
|
On 17-nov-2022 apifix was notified of the patient's device removal performed on (b)(6) 2022.Per the reporter, the case went well.Both top screws appeared to have pulled out (x-rays were provided). the implants are expected to be returned to apifix for evaluation.Should additional information be made available, apifix will file a follow up mdr.
|