• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE Back to Search Results
Model Number 101-9812
Device Problems Difficult to Open or Close (2921); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/01/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: product family: superion implant.Upn: 101-9810.Model: superion ids 10mm.Serial: n/a.Batch: 29360264.Product family: superion implant.Upn: 101-9810.Model: superion ids 10mm.Serial: n/a.Batch: 29360264.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during the superion indirect decompression system implant procedure as the physician was deploying the implant when reaching approximately 45% the implanter would disengage, and the implant could not be opened any further.The implant was removed, and it was observed that the spindle cap had broken.A second attempt to implant a device was utilized, upon deployment the implanter disengaged at approximately 45% and implant broke at the spindle cap.A third device was utilized with the same results.The procedure was then aborted.It was also noted that there may have been thick bone, osteophytes, or other obstructions causing resistance.This report is for the first device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during the superion indirect decompression system implant procedure as the physician was deploying the implant when reaching approximately 45% the implanter would disengage, and the implant could not be opened any further.The implant was removed, and it was observed that the spindle cap had broken.A second attempt to implant a device was utilized, upon deployment the implanter disengaged at approximately 45% and implant broke at the spindle cap.A third device was utilized with the same results.The procedure was then aborted.It was also noted that there may have been thick bone, osteophytes, or other obstructions causing resistance.This report is for the first device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: product family: superion implant.Upn: 101-9810.Model: superion ids 10mm.Serial: n/a.Batch: 29360264.Product family: superion implant.Upn: 101-9810.Model: superion ids 10mm.Serial: n/a.Batch: 29360264.Analysis of the returned indirect decompression (id) spacer revealed that the spindle cap was completely sheared off from the implant body.The damage to the implant indicates failure was due to a combination of deployment against resistance and physician failing to correctly attach the inserter to the spacer.A labelling review was performed, and it did not reveal any anomalies.Additionally, device breakage can occur when used with forced deployment and is noted within the instructions for use (ifu) as a potential complication associated with the use of the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: product family: superion implant, upn: 101-9810, model: superion ids 10mm, serial: n/a, batch: 29360264.Product family: superion implant, upn: 101-9810, model: superion ids 10mm, serial: n/a, batch: 29360264.Analysis of the returned indirect decompression (id) spacer revealed that the spindle cap was completely sheared off from the implant body.The damage to the implant indicates failure was due to a combination of deployment against resistance and physician failing to correctly attach the inserter to the spacer.A labelling review was performed, and it did not reveal any anomalies.Additionally, device breakage can occur when used with forced deployment and is noted within the instructions for use (ifu) as a potential complication associated with the use of the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during the superion indirect decompression system implant procedure as the physician was deploying the implant when reaching approximately 45% the implanter would disengage, and the implant could not be opened any further.The implant was removed, and it was observed that the spindle cap had broken.A second attempt to implant a device was utilized, upon deployment the implanter disengaged at approximately 45% and implant broke at the spindle cap.A third device was utilized with the same results.The procedure was then aborted.It was also noted that there may have been thick bone, osteophytes, or other obstructions causing resistance.This report is for the first device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
erik sherburne
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
7632920920
MDR Report Key15498771
MDR Text Key304871047
Report Number3006630150-2022-05073
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NQO
UDI-Device Identifier00884662000543
UDI-Public00884662000543
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/22/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number101-9812
Device Catalogue Number101-9812
Device Lot Number29540069
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/01/2022
Initial Date FDA Received09/28/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/13/2023
02/10/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/07/2023
02/22/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/07/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight113 KG
Patient RaceWhite
-
-