• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TAEWOONG MEDICAL CO.,LTD. NITI-S PYLORIC & DUODENAL UNCOVERED STENT; PYLORIC & DUODENAL STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TAEWOONG MEDICAL CO.,LTD. NITI-S PYLORIC & DUODENAL UNCOVERED STENT; PYLORIC & DUODENAL STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number DXDT2208
Device Problems Break (1069); Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/30/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
(b)(6) 2022: another stent was placed for the duodenal stenosis.(b)(6) 2022: dxdt2208 was additionally placed for re-stenosis due to in-growth by stent-in-stent method.The in-growth was found due to the patient complaining bad condition.(b)(6) 2022: the patient complained bad condition and then an obstruction due to another re-stenosis was suspected, so upper endoscopy was performed, and then the stent was found being partially fractured at 3cm from the mouth edge, where coming out into the stomach.The physician determined to remove the fractured stent (dxdt2208) by forceps and additionally place dct2010bp by stent-in-stent method in the other stent and the procedure was finished.Information of chemotherapy is not available.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.This case is linked to a previous reported case (mdr registration number: #3003902943-2022-00028).This stent fracture case being reported was used with a stent that was previously reported for another case.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that after placement of another stent, in-growth was found and dxdt2208 was placed.3 months later, fracture occurred.Based on the attached photo, it was confirmed that part of the fractured stent was removed.It was confirmed from the device history record that device had been manufactured with no significant issue and passed all the inspections successfully.However, it is hard to exactly analysis because the device was not returned yet.Investigation will be conducted once device is returned and we will send follow-up report accordingly.
 
Event Description
(b)(6) 2022: another stent was placed for the duodenal stenosis.(b)(6) 2022: dxdt2208 was additionally placed for re-stenosis due to in-growth by stent-in-stent method.The in-growth was found due to the patient complaining bad condition.(b)(6) 2022: the patient complained bad condition and then an obstruction due to another re-stenosis was suspected, so upper endoscopy was performed, and then the stent was found being partially fractured at 3cm from the mouth edge, where coming out into the stomach.The physician determined to remove the fractured stent (dxdt2208) by forceps and additionally place dct2010bp by stent-in-stent method in the other stent and the procedure was finished.Information of chemotherapy is not available.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.This case is linked to a previous reported case (mdr registration number: #3003902943-2022-00028).This stent fracture case being reported was used with a stent that was previously reported for another case.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that after placement of another stent, in-growth was found and dxdt2208 was placed.3 months later, fracture occurred.Based on the attached photo, it was confirmed that part of the fractured stent was removed.As a result of analysis of returned device, the fractured part of the stent (around 3cm) was returned.It was confirmed from the device history record that device had been manufactured with no significant issue and passed all the inspections successfully.Fracture can occur in any company's device as well as ours.It is affected by patient's lesion status, peristalsis of organs, and drug use in general.Stent can be frequently pressured due to patient's lesion status, and fracture can be possible.However, it is hard to identify the exact root cause since it is hard to reconstruct the situation at the time of procedure.It is difficult to identify the exact root cause because it is difficult to reconstruct the situation at the time of procedure.However, based on the description "stent was found being partially fractured", it is assumed that fracture occurred 3 months later due to the strong pressure at the patient's lesion, peristalsis, etc.Complexly.Through the user manual by taewoong, it is stated that "potential complications associated with the use of niti-s & comvi stent may include, but are not limited to: stent fracture".This suspected device is not registered in the us but we will continuously monitor the same or similar customer complaints through accurate analyses.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NITI-S PYLORIC & DUODENAL UNCOVERED STENT
Type of Device
PYLORIC & DUODENAL STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TAEWOONG MEDICAL CO.,LTD.
14, gojeong-ro
wolgot-myeon
gimpo-si, gyeonggi-do 10022
KS  10022
Manufacturer (Section G)
TAEWOONG MEDICAL CO.,LTD.
14, gojeong-ro
wolgot-myeon
gimpo-si, gyeonggi-do 10022
KS   10022
Manufacturer Contact
lee
14, gojeong-ro
wolgot-myeon
gimpo-si, gyeonggi-do 10022
MDR Report Key15507178
MDR Text Key306418510
Report Number3003902943-2022-00029
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUM
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Distributor
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/06/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberDXDT2208
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/06/2022
Initial Date FDA Received09/29/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/06/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/12/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-