• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX Back to Search Results
Model Number PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX
Device Problems Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 09/19/2022
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant products included as part of this report include: pr-2503097, catalog item name tele assy sync unit, catalog item identifier 453564025901, serial number (b)(4).Pr-2503315, catalog item name tele assy sync unit, catalog item identifier 453564025901, serial number (b)(4).Pr-2503338, catalog item name tele mx40, 2.4 ghz, ecg &sp02, exchange, catalog item identifier 453564262551, serial number (b)(4).A follow-up report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation and cross reference to include mfg report number for pr 2503338.
 
Event Description
Fault situation of the its telemetry system.In the event of a failure, the vital signs of telemetry monitored (mx40) patients were not displayed in the philips patient information center ix (pic ix) central monitoring system and their alarms were not transferred to the pic ix central monitoring system.The failure caused a disturbance in the ward, as a result of which one patient died.The fault was found on (b)(6) 2022 at 8:30 by nurses.Patients were connected to mx40 devices and it was moved to monitoring mode.Patient monitoring was continued even though the connection to the pic ix center was lost.The patient's weak condition was noted on (b)(6) 2022 at 17:45, when the nurses had visited the patient.The telemetry device was found to have turned off because it had run out of batteries (not able to generate alarms).Attempts had been made to resuscitate the patient, but it was unsuccessful.The patient was dead at 18:05.
 
Event Description
Fault situation of the its telemetry system.In the event of a failure, the vital signs of telemetry monitored (mx40) patients were not displayed in the philips patient information center ix (pic ix) central monitoring system and their alarms were not transferred to the pic ix central monitoring system.The failure caused a disturbance in the ward, as a result of which one patient died.The fault was found on (b)(6) 2022 at 8:30 by nurses.Patients were connected to mx40 devices and it was moved to monitoring mode.Patient monitoring was continued even though the connection to the pic ix center was lost.The patient's weak condition was noted on (b)(6) 2022 at 17:45, when the nurses had visited the patient.The telemetry device was found to have turned off because it had run out of batteries (not able to generate alarms).Attempts had been made to resuscitate the patient, but it was unsuccessful.The patient was dead at 18:05.A philips service operations manager (som) contacted the customer biomedical engineer (biomed).Per the som, it was not known exactly whether the mx40 device had alerted about the battery running out.If it did the end users had not heard or noticed it.The pic ixs its telemetry system had been in failure mode (system down) about 12 hours before the event.At that time, the mx40 devices operated in the monitoring mode (standalone), i.E.Mx40 were not connected to pic ix central monitoring.The mx40 battery end log data was not available because the its system was down, thus the log data was not updated to the pic ix system.Running out of the mx40 battery is the likely reason that the device had turned off, because the mx40 device had returned to normal operation as soon as its battery was replaced.The som indicated that the root cause for the its system down turned out to be a network hardware failure; the trunk fiber cable between the data switches failed.The fault was fixed by the hospital's biomed/ict staff the next day.The device remains at the customer site.No further investigation or action is warranted at this time.Cross reference mfg report number 1218950-2022-00923.
 
Event Description
Fault situation of the its telemetry system.In the event of a failure, the vital signs of telemetry monitored (mx40) patients were not displayed in the philips patient information center ix (pic ix) central monitoring system and their alarms were not transferred to the pic ix central monitoring system.The failure caused a disturbance in the ward, as a result of which one patient died.The fault was found on (b)(6) 2022 at 8:30 by nurses.Patients were connected to mx40 devices and it was moved to monitoring mode.Patient monitoring was continued even though the connection to the pic ix center was lost.The patient's weak condition was noted on (b)(6) 2022 at 17:45, when the nurses had visited the patient.The telemetry device was found to have turned off because it had run out of batteries (not able to generate alarms).Attempts had been made to resuscitate the patient, but it was unsuccessful.The patient was dead at 18:05.A philips service operations manager (som) contacted the customer biomedical engineer (biomed).Per the som, it was not known exactly whether the mx40 device had alerted about the battery running out.If it did the end users had not heard or noticed it.The pic ixs its telemetry system had been in failure mode (system down) about 12 hours before the event.At that time, the mx40 devices operated in the monitoring mode (standalone), i.E.Mx40 were not connected to pic ix central monitoring.The mx40 battery end log data was not available because the its system was down, thus the log data was not updated to the pic ix system.Running out of the mx40 battery is the likely reason that the device had turned off, because the mx40 device had returned to normal operation as soon as its battery was replaced.The som indicated that the root cause for the its system down turned out to be a network hardware failure; the trunk fiber cable between the data switches failed.The fault was fixed by the hospital's biomed/ict staff the next day.The device remains at the customer site.No further investigation or action is warranted at this time.Additional information received indicating the fiber cables were determined to not be a philips product.Cross reference mfg report number 1218950-2022-00923.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B5: additional information received indicating the fiber cables were determined to not be a philips product.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional conclusion code.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX
Type of Device
PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC
3000 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC
3000 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer Contact
jeanne ahearn
222 jacobs st
cambridge, MA 02141
6172455900
MDR Report Key15519050
MDR Text Key300986889
Report Number1218950-2022-00904
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHX
UDI-Device Identifier00884838048645
UDI-Public00884838048645
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFI
PMA/PMN Number
K153702
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX
Device Catalogue Number866389
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/20/2022
Initial Date FDA Received09/30/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/20/2022
09/20/2022
09/20/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/09/2022
11/18/2022
12/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/14/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age87 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight77 KG
-
-