• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX Back to Search Results
Model Number 866389
Device Problems Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 09/13/2022
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product and 501k information is unknown at this time.Information will be required.2490312 will address issue with mx40 and 2522368 will address issue with piic.A follow-up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the telepack mx40 transferred from different zones in picix not done properly by customer resulted in monitor loss.The nursing staff was attempting to monitor patients with mx40 to the central station.While troubleshooting the issue, the patient expired while not being monitored.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the telepack mx40 transferred from different zones in picix not done properly by customer resulted in monitor loss.The nursing staff was attempting to monitor patients with mx40 to the central station.While troubleshooting the issue, the patient expired while not being monitored.A good faith effort (gfe) was sent to obtain additional information regarding the issue.Per gfe response, the customer was undergoing a picix rev b to rev c upgrade the day the incident happened; due to the upgrade and downtime caused by the upgrade, the customer biomed team moved 6 mx40s from one unit to another.However, the device transfer was not done properly, and they did not assign a proper rf id code.Also, the biomed did not confirm with the fse and returned the units (mx40s) to the nurses.The nursing team was not able to use and assign the tele packs in the central station and the patient.While the nursing team was troubleshooting the mx40 connection to the central stations the patient incidents occurred.When the fse philips team investigated the problem, it was noted that the mx40 tele packs were not configured to the correct rf access code, and it was confirmed by the customer biomed team that the mistake was made by their own team members.Further, it was stated neither the mx40 or piic contributed to the patient death, but it would be considered a near miss.The nursing team was troubleshooting the connection from the mx40 to the central station when the patient incident occurred.The mx40 telemetry device involved in this event is report in mfr number 1218950-2022-00898.
 
Event Description
The customer during a picix rev b to rev c upgrade, the customer biomed transferred 6 mx40s from 3b-cardiology unit to 3b-icu unit.During the transfer the customer did not match the rf access code in the mx40s with that of the picix, so the device and the its system were in different rf access codes.A philips field service engineer (fse) went to the customer site.The engineer determined that the issue was associated with the customer underdoing a picix rev b to rev c upgrade.The customer biomed team moved 6 mx40s from the 3b-cardiology unit to 3b-icu unit.The devices were not properly assigned a proper rf id code.Also, the biomed did not confirm with the fse and returned the units, mx40s, to the nurses.The nursing team was not able to use and assign the tele packs in the central station and the patient.While the nursing team was troubleshooting the mx40 connection to the central stations the patient incidents occurred.When the fse philips team investigated the problem it was noted that the mx40 tele packs were not configured to the correct rf access code, and it was confirmed by the customer biomed team that the mistake was made by of their team members.The fse confirmed that the mx40 did not contribute to the patient death, and the customer biomed team confirmed that the mistake was made by their team members.The fse also confirmed that the telemetry units were configured to the correct rf access code after the reported incident.The device was in use on a patient at the time of event.There was an adverse event reported; however, the device did not cause or contribute to the event reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX
Type of Device
PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC
3000 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC
3000 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer Contact
jeanne ahearn
222 jacobs st
cambridge, MA 02141
6172455900
MDR Report Key15525687
MDR Text Key300987475
Report Number1218950-2022-00901
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHX
UDI-Device Identifier00884838048645
UDI-Public00884838048645
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K153702
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number866389
Device Catalogue Number866389
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/13/2022
Initial Date FDA Received10/01/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/28/2022
11/17/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/25/2022
11/21/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/20/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age94 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-