Catalog Number 443987 |
Device Problem
False Negative Result (1225)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/05/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Unknown manufacturer: there are multiple bd locations where this unspecified bd device may have been manufactured.A catalog and lot number could not be confirmed for this incident and without this information we are unable to determine where the device was manufactured.Therefore, bd corporate headquarters in (b)(4) has been listed and (b)(4) fda registration number has been used for the manufacture report number.There is no 510(k) for this device as it is manufactured outside the us and not sold in the us but is considered to be substantially similar to the legally u.S.Marketed device kit bd max enteric viral panel catalog number 443985 with 510k # k181427.Medical device expiration date: unknown.Device manufacture date: unknown.A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that while using kit bd max enteric viral panel the user tested noro/roto ring trial and failed in norovirus genotype i detection, even though the assay should detect g i/ii.Patients were involved but there's no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: user tested noro/roto ring trial and failed in norovirus genotype i detection, even though the assay should detect g i/ii.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that while using kit bd max enteric viral panel the user tested noro/roto ring trial and failed in norovirus genotype i detection, even though the assay should detect g i/ii.Patients were involved but there's no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: user tested noro/roto ring trial and failed in norovirus genotype i detection, even though the assay should detect g i/ii.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
After further evaluation of the complaint, it has been determined that the previously submitted report # was sent in error.There was no report of serious injury, medical intervention, or reportable device malfunction.Therefore this is not considered to be a reportable malfunction.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|