• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) KIT BD MAX ENTERIC VIRAL PANEL; GASTROINTESTINAL PATHOGEN PANEL MULTIPLEX NUCLEIC ACID-BASED ASSAY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) KIT BD MAX ENTERIC VIRAL PANEL; GASTROINTESTINAL PATHOGEN PANEL MULTIPLEX NUCLEIC ACID-BASED ASSAY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 443987
Device Problem False Negative Result (1225)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/05/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Unknown manufacturer: there are multiple bd locations where this unspecified bd device may have been manufactured.A catalog and lot number could not be confirmed for this incident and without this information we are unable to determine where the device was manufactured.Therefore, bd corporate headquarters in (b)(4) has been listed and (b)(4) fda registration number has been used for the manufacture report number.There is no 510(k) for this device as it is manufactured outside the us and not sold in the us but is considered to be substantially similar to the legally u.S.Marketed device kit bd max enteric viral panel catalog number 443985 with 510k # k181427.Medical device expiration date: unknown.Device manufacture date: unknown.A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using kit bd max enteric viral panel the user tested noro/roto ring trial and failed in norovirus genotype i detection, even though the assay should detect g i/ii.Patients were involved but there's no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: user tested noro/roto ring trial and failed in norovirus genotype i detection, even though the assay should detect g i/ii.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using kit bd max enteric viral panel the user tested noro/roto ring trial and failed in norovirus genotype i detection, even though the assay should detect g i/ii.Patients were involved but there's no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: user tested noro/roto ring trial and failed in norovirus genotype i detection, even though the assay should detect g i/ii.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
After further evaluation of the complaint, it has been determined that the previously submitted report # was sent in error.There was no report of serious injury, medical intervention, or reportable device malfunction.Therefore this is not considered to be a reportable malfunction.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
KIT BD MAX ENTERIC VIRAL PANEL
Type of Device
GASTROINTESTINAL PATHOGEN PANEL MULTIPLEX NUCLEIC ACID-BASED ASSAY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key15528712
MDR Text Key301749564
Report Number1119779-2022-01257
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PCH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K181427
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/28/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue Number443987
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/19/2022
Initial Date FDA Received10/03/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/28/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/08/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-