Additional information/correction: b5 - update provided; h4 - production date.Based upon the investigation results, the case has been re-assessed and found to be non-reportable.There was no product failure found.Investigation results: visual investigation: optically, the perforator is in a used but good condition.The investigation was further carried out by aesculap technical service (ats), following the corresponding test plan for the article number.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records (dhr) have been checked for all leading device(s) lot numbers and the products found to be according to our specification valid at the time of production.There are no similar complaints against the same lot number(s) with this error pattern.Explanation and rationale: there is no indication for a product failure.Besides signs of wear and tear, no failure could be detected.The perforator works as intended.However, a re-grinding is recommended.Several points can be found within the corresponding instructions for use (ifu) regarding functional checks and cutting edges.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures: based upon the investigation results, no failure could be detected regarding the complained failure pattern; functions as intended.Based upon the investigations results a capa is not necessary.
|