The reason for this instrument failure was reported as bearing broke off.The healthcare professional indicated that this event occurred during surgery, near the patient.There was a 20 minute delay in surgery but the surgery was completed as intended.The device was inspected prior to use and found to be acceptable.The device was not returned to the manufacturer and not made available at djo surgical for evaluation.The revision level or lot number were not reported, therefore this instrument could not be linked to a specific device history record (dhr) or the actual date of manufacture could not be determined with confidence.Complaint database review showed 3 previous complaints but there were no indications that this instrument has a design or material deficiency.Those are 3 - broke/cracked/damaged.The root cause for this complaint cannot be determined with complete confidence as the instrument was not returned for investigational review.It is likely attributable to damage incurred from prolonged use and through misuse or rough handling which surgical instruments are subjected to.This is not an event associated with a product failure, malfunction, or issue.There are no indications that the instrument has a design or material deficiency.Therefore, no containment of inventory is required.Event is associated with instrument usage, not a design or manufacturing issue.Rma examination: the reported device was not returned to djo surgical for evaluation.The agent stated that the items were discarded.If at a later time the device is returned an amendment will be opened.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
|