It was reported that, after a right tha had been performed on (b)(6) 2018 to address a diagnosis of advanced degeneration of the hip joint, the patient suffered an infection positive for mssa along with an hematoma and required a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2018.During this procedure, an incision and drainage was performed with an exchange of the femoral head and acetabular liner.Further information is not known.
|
Section h3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, although additional medical records were not received, it is noted the patient had a revision due to methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infection and hematoma.Hematoma is a known complication of any surgical procedure and is likely associated with the surgery.It cannot be concluded the infection or hematoma were associated with a mal performance of the implant or implant failure.The patient impact beyond the reported revision cannot be determined with the limited information provided.A review of complaint history of the previous 12 months revealed similar events for the listed device, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the instructions for use documents for total hip systems revealed that wound hematoma and infection, both early, post-operative superficial and early, post-operative deep wound infection and late periprosthetic infection have been identified as potential complications associated with total hip arthroplasty surgery, primary or revision.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include loss of sterility during procedure, patient reaction, and post-operative healing issue.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|