• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US UNKNOWN HIP FEMORAL HEAD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US UNKNOWN HIP FEMORAL HEAD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK HIP FEMORAL HEAD
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Physical Asymmetry (4573)
Event Date 01/01/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).The device catalog number is unknown; therefore, udi is unavailable.Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Article entitled ¿exeter vs summit stems in total hip arthroplasty at 5 year follow up.¿ written by c.O¿sullivan, g.Sheridan, l.Vernon, k.Linehan, n.Lynch, r.Gul, s.Guerin, and j.Harty published in irish medical journal in 2018 was reviewed.This retrospective cohort study seeks to compare the clinical outcomes of the exeter cemented stem and the summit cementless stem at a minimum of five years.817 patients were involved in the study.Of those 394 patients were implanted with a cementless summit stem.Of those 394 patients, 392 were implanted with a pinnacle cup.Adverse events for summit within 5 years: 1 patient was revised for pain.4 patients were revised for periprosthetic fractures.1 patient was revised for infection.2 patients were revised for leg length discrepancy.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : no device associated with this report was received for examination.This complaint was opened to document complaints derived through a journal article review.Follow-ups were done to try and obtain additional information from the author of the journal article.No further information was received.Device history lot : a manufacturing record evaluation (mre), was not possible because the required lot code was not provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN HIP FEMORAL HEAD
Type of Device
HIP FEMORAL HEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46581 0988
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. 1818910
700 orthopaedic dr.
warsaw IN 46581 0988
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
700 orthpaedic dr.
warsaw, IN 46581
3035526892
MDR Report Key15588003
MDR Text Key301579028
Report Number1818910-2022-20234
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeEI
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK HIP FEMORAL HEAD
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/27/2022
Initial Date FDA Received10/12/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/18/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-