• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS ESHEATH INTRODUCER SET; INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS ESHEATH INTRODUCER SET; INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 9610ES14
Device Problem Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem Unspecified Vascular Problem (4441)
Event Date 09/22/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As reported by our affiliates in (b)(6), this was a 26mm sapien 3 ultra case by transfemoral approach in aortic position.Due to heavy calcification in the right groin near the abdominal aorta, it was not possible to cross with the esheath.It was tried with several dilatations, shockwave, and different maneuvers but it was not possible to cross.In total, 3 or 4 esheaths were used and all of them damaged while attempting to introduce them.After placing a peripheral stent because of some bleeding, it was decided to abort the procedure to discuss alternatives.Further procedure by transapical approach was planned, but the patient died on the same evening due to cardiac failure.According to the physician, the bleeding was close to the access site, but it is unknown what caused the bleeding.The most likely reason was the difficult trial to open the calcification and use many sheaths, wires, balloons, etc.The patient had a long-lasting failing case with complications in the groin, the patient needed blood transfusion, and had issues with low pressure problems several times.Cause of patient's death was cardiac failure.The esheath was not the reason for the patient's death.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is ongoing.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated h6-type of investigation, investigation findings corrected h6- investigation conclusions the device was not returned for evaluation.The complaint for damaged sheath was unable to be confirmed without procedural imagery or the returned device.As the device was not returned, engineering was unable to perform any visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.Therefore, the presence of a manufacturing non-conformance was unable to be determined.Dhr and lot history did not reveal any manufacturing non-conformance.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.Furthermore, there was no report of any issues with the sheath during device preparation or unpacking, indicating that this was not an out of the box issue.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported events are an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure modes are not required at this time.Per complaint details, "due to the heavy calcification in the right groin near the abdominal aorta, it was not possible to cross with the esheath.It was tried with several dilatations, shockwave, different maneuvers but it was not possible to cross.In total, 3 or 4 esheath were used and all of them damaged (all kinked, one split at the liner but not opened) while attempting to introduce them.The bleeding was close to the access site and it is unknown what has caused the bleeding- most possible reason was the hard trial to open the calcification and use many sheaths, wires, balloons, etc." per the ifu/training manual, "system advancement force can vary due to angle of access and insertion, vessel diameter, tortuosity and degree of calcification." heavy calcification can present a barrier in introducing the sheath as well as reducing the vessel lumen diameter.In order to overcome the calcification, excessive manipulation was likely used.Excessive manipulation could have caused the sheath to become kinked, as reported.Additionally, although it is not known what the exact damage to the sheath is, the sheath tip can become damaged through contact with sharp calcified nodules.The liner can also become weakened and shaft body can be damaged through contact with calcification.As such, available information suggests that patient factors (calcification) and/or procedural factors (excessive manipulation) may have contributed to the complaint event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS ESHEATH INTRODUCER SET
Type of Device
INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key15591003
MDR Text Key301628075
Report Number2015691-2022-08537
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K200258
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9610ES14
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot Number64423129
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/22/2022
Initial Date FDA Received10/12/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/14/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/15/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/07/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age82 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-