|
Device Problem
Material Rupture (1546)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No product is being returned to applied medical for evaluation.A follow-up report will be provided upon completion of investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
Procedure performed: robotic myomectomy.Event description: initial information received on 3oct2022: last friday, i had a call with [name] (ireland ¿ territory manager), and it seems that the alexis ces gen 2 was misused.I don¿t know the details, but it seems that the surgeon didn¿t use the guard or the retractor and the ces bag was cut during the manual morcellation.The case happened at the end of (b)(6), at the (b)(6).The device used was gtk 14 (probably).Information received upon completion of the complaint form on (b)(6) 2022: performing a robotic myomectomy and was trying to perform the excite technique.Confusion over exactly on how she wanted use the alexis ces did not want to use the guard as it was restricting her ability to access the fibroid to perform the excite technique.She was having severe difficulty in performing the actual excite technique as she experienced consistent slippage with the toothed graspers in use.And the small size of the incision.Therefore the actual excite technique was not performed correctly.Patient status: no patient injury has been reported.Type of intervention: ni.
|
|
Event Description
|
Procedure performed: robotic myomectomy.Event description: initial information received on 3oct2022: last friday, i had a call with [name] (ireland ¿ territory manager), and it seems that the alexis ces gen 2 was misused.I don¿t know the details, but it seems that the surgeon didn¿t use the guard or the retractor and the ces bag was cut during the manual morcellation.The case happened at the end of july, at the [facility].The device used was gtk 14 (probably).Information received upon completion of the complaint form on 5oct2022: performing a robotic myomectomy and was trying to perform the excite technique.Confusion over exactly on how she wanted use the alexis ces did not want to use the guard as it was restricting her ability to access the fibroid to perform the excite technique.She was having severe difficulty in performing the actual excite technique as she experienced consistent slippage with the toothed graspers in use.And the small size of the incision.Therefore the actual excite technique was not performed correctly.Additional information received from applied medical representative via email 15dec2022: the only codes ordered and placed on the shelf in [facility] are the gtk14 and gtk17.Also, these are the only alexis contained extraction systems used by [doctor name redacted] when she was performing the excite technique.They were the original code of the alexis ces contained extraction system with kii balloon blunt tip access system not the gen 2 with the tether on the bag and with alexis wound protector /retractor combined.The code did not change from gen 1 to gen 2.Patient status: no patient injury has been reported.Type of intervention: ni.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The event unit was not returned to applied medical for evaluation.As the event unit was not returned, applied medical is unable to determine if the event unit exhibited any non-conformances that could have contributed to the reported event.In the absence of the event unit, it is difficult to determine if the reported event was caused by a manufacturing non-conformance or circumstantial factors at the time of use.Applied medical has reviewed the details surrounding the event and is unable to determine the exact root cause of the event.The probability and criticality of harm resulting from this failure have been evaluated and were found to be at an acceptable level.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|