• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APPLIED MEDICAL RESOURCES UNKNOWN; LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APPLIED MEDICAL RESOURCES UNKNOWN; LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY Back to Search Results
Device Problem Material Rupture (1546)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
No product is being returned to applied medical for evaluation.A follow-up report will be provided upon completion of investigation.
 
Event Description
Procedure performed: robotic myomectomy.Event description: initial information received on 3oct2022: last friday, i had a call with [name] (ireland ¿ territory manager), and it seems that the alexis ces gen 2 was misused.I don¿t know the details, but it seems that the surgeon didn¿t use the guard or the retractor and the ces bag was cut during the manual morcellation.The case happened at the end of (b)(6), at the (b)(6).The device used was gtk 14 (probably).Information received upon completion of the complaint form on (b)(6) 2022: performing a robotic myomectomy and was trying to perform the excite technique.Confusion over exactly on how she wanted use the alexis ces did not want to use the guard as it was restricting her ability to access the fibroid to perform the excite technique.She was having severe difficulty in performing the actual excite technique as she experienced consistent slippage with the toothed graspers in use.And the small size of the incision.Therefore the actual excite technique was not performed correctly.Patient status: no patient injury has been reported.Type of intervention: ni.
 
Event Description
Procedure performed: robotic myomectomy.Event description: initial information received on 3oct2022: last friday, i had a call with [name] (ireland ¿ territory manager), and it seems that the alexis ces gen 2 was misused.I don¿t know the details, but it seems that the surgeon didn¿t use the guard or the retractor and the ces bag was cut during the manual morcellation.The case happened at the end of july, at the [facility].The device used was gtk 14 (probably).Information received upon completion of the complaint form on 5oct2022: performing a robotic myomectomy and was trying to perform the excite technique.Confusion over exactly on how she wanted use the alexis ces did not want to use the guard as it was restricting her ability to access the fibroid to perform the excite technique.She was having severe difficulty in performing the actual excite technique as she experienced consistent slippage with the toothed graspers in use.And the small size of the incision.Therefore the actual excite technique was not performed correctly.Additional information received from applied medical representative via email 15dec2022: the only codes ordered and placed on the shelf in [facility] are the gtk14 and gtk17.Also, these are the only alexis contained extraction systems used by [doctor name redacted] when she was performing the excite technique.They were the original code of the alexis ces contained extraction system with kii balloon blunt tip access system not the gen 2 with the tether on the bag and with alexis wound protector /retractor combined.The code did not change from gen 1 to gen 2.Patient status: no patient injury has been reported.Type of intervention: ni.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The event unit was not returned to applied medical for evaluation.As the event unit was not returned, applied medical is unable to determine if the event unit exhibited any non-conformances that could have contributed to the reported event.In the absence of the event unit, it is difficult to determine if the reported event was caused by a manufacturing non-conformance or circumstantial factors at the time of use.Applied medical has reviewed the details surrounding the event and is unable to determine the exact root cause of the event.The probability and criticality of harm resulting from this failure have been evaluated and were found to be at an acceptable level.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN
Type of Device
LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
APPLIED MEDICAL RESOURCES
22872 avenida empresa
rancho santa margarita CA 92688
Manufacturer Contact
aaron fulcher
22872 avenida empresa
rancho santa margarita, CA 92688
9497135765
MDR Report Key15601958
MDR Text Key307268034
Report Number2027111-2022-00777
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GCJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeEI
PMA/PMN Number
UNKNOWN
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/09/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/30/2022
Initial Date FDA Received10/13/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/30/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/09/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ROBOT, TOOTHED GRASPERS
-
-