• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZA9003
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Insert (1316)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/22/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient weight: unknown, as information was asked but not provided.Date implanted: not applicable, as the iol was removed and replaced during the same date explanted: not applicable, as the iol was removed and replaced during the same procedure.Telephone number: (b)(6).The device was not returned for analysis.Therefore, a visual analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and historical data analysis for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch report will be filed.Attempts were made to obtain missing information; however, the account did not have the information.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported upon insertion of the intraocular lens (iol) into the patient's left eye the doctor noticed the haptic was bent and was unable to center the iol.The iol was explanted during the same procedure and replaced successfully with back-up lens with the same model and diopter size.There was no medical intervention, no procedure delay, no incision enlargement, no sutures required, and no vitrectomy.Patient outcome post-procedure was reported as stable.No further information is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes section d-9: date returned to manufacturer: 07-nov-2022 section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received coated in viscoelastic residue and with haptic damaged.The lens was cleaned and, no further issues were observed.The complaint issue 'positioning issue' was not confirmed.The complaint issue 'haptic damaged' was observed during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the investigation results, there is no indication of a product malfunction or product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Type of Device
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15601981
MDR Text Key307266204
Report Number3012236936-2022-02556
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474528963
UDI-Public(01)05050474528963(17)240724
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P990080
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberZA9003
Device Catalogue NumberZA90030175
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/22/2022
Initial Date FDA Received10/13/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/30/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/22/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/24/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceNative Hawaiian Or Other Pacific Islander
-
-