• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: REMOTE DIAGNOSTIC TECHNOLOGIES (RDT) TEMPUS PRO; MONITOR, PHYSIOLOGICAL, PATIENT(WITH ARRHYTHMIA DETECTION OR ALARMS)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

REMOTE DIAGNOSTIC TECHNOLOGIES (RDT) TEMPUS PRO; MONITOR, PHYSIOLOGICAL, PATIENT(WITH ARRHYTHMIA DETECTION OR ALARMS) Back to Search Results
Model Number 00-1024-R
Device Problems Computer Software Problem (1112); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/16/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
As described by the customer 'when the ems crew were using the video laryngoscope to intubate the patient, when they used the "image capture" feature the tempus pro device immediately "shut down"'.Crew had to restart the device to continue to monitor patient with the device until arrival at the hospital.The customer reports the video laryngoscope was not unplugged from the usb port.A user report was received related to a reported product problem which is currently being investigated.At the time of reporting, the device has been returned for investigation.Further updates will be provided when the device investigation has progressed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is based on information provided by philips repair service personnel and has been investigated by the philips complaint handling team.Philips received a complaint on the tempus pro indicating that tempus pro - monitor shut down when using video laryngoscope "image capture" when intubating their patient.Customer confirmed was not unplugged from the usb port.The complaint was escalated for technical investigation and the results indicate that after event device passes startup self test.No error messages were displayed and no warning messages was given prior to shut down.No patient harm noted.At the bench: engineer confirmed complaint the unit will restart when there are a large number of photos are taken with the use of a video laryngoscope as few as (b)(6) photos can overwhelm the device and require a restart.This failure mode was escalated to r&d for additional investigation.The primary root cause was identified as inadequate software verification and validation.The data entered in this complaint record will be utilized for product quality and safety improvements per the post market surveillance and risk management processes.The investigation concludes that no further action is required at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TEMPUS PRO
Type of Device
MONITOR, PHYSIOLOGICAL, PATIENT(WITH ARRHYTHMIA DETECTION OR ALARMS)
Manufacturer (Section D)
REMOTE DIAGNOSTIC TECHNOLOGIES (RDT)
ascent 1, aerospace centre
aerospace boulevard
farnborough
UK 
Manufacturer (Section G)
REMOTE DIAGNOSTIC TECHNOLOGIES (RDT)
ascent 1, aerospace centre
aerospace boulevard
farnborough
UK  
Manufacturer Contact
selvaganesan balu
ascent 1, aerospace centre
aerospace boulevard
farnborough 
UK  
MDR Report Key15604230
MDR Text Key303629595
Report Number3003832357-2022-00032
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHX
UDI-Device Identifier05060472441027
UDI-Public05060472441027
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K201746
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number00-1024-R
Device Catalogue Number989706000051
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/16/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/16/2022
Initial Date FDA Received10/14/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/16/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/15/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-