• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS) BD MAX¿ CT/GC/TV; TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS) BD MAX¿ CT/GC/TV; TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 442970
Device Problem False Positive Result (1227)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/03/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that while using bd max¿ ct/gc/tv the customer got a false positives for chlamydia.Sample was recollected and rerun and came out negative.No patient impact was reported.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer claims false pos for chalmydia for 2 patient samples; 1-st false pos obtained on (b)(6) 2022, run # 2626; 2-nd false pos obtained on (b)(6) 2022, run #2631; both samples were re-collected and re-run, both came out neg; repeats were ordered by the doctor; no erroneous results were reported, no unnecessary patient treatments were administered.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.6 investigation summary: inv-22-plc-365.The complaint concerns two samples, positive for the chlamydia (ct) target with bd max¿ ct/gc/tv (ref#442970) kit lot 2137538, that gave discrepant negative results upon repeat test performed with re-collected specimens.Complaint history review showed no other complaint received on bd max¿ ct/gc/tv kit lot 2137538.In the last twelve months, five other complaints were received regarding discrepant or false positive results with bd max¿ ct/gc/tv.Various potential root causes were identified such as sample contamination and samples at assay limit of detection (lod).Based on the complaint review, no reagents issue was identified.No anomaly was observed, in bhr review of bd max¿ ct/gc/tv kit lot 2137538 which could have a link with the customer issue.Also, the kit met the release specifications and qc results were within the trends.Retain material was not tested since it would not provide more information than what is available from the final qc test.A gross product contamination would have been detected by the final qc test, which is not the case.No sample was received for investigation.The customer is questioning positive results for the chlamydia (ct) target with bd max¿ ct/gc/tv kit lot 2137538, and has identified samples (b)(6) in position b11 (run (b)(6)) and sample (b)(6) in position a3 (run (b)(6)) as suspected discrepant results.According to the complaint text, these two samples repeated negative on the bd max¿ from a recollected specimen (run (b)(6) sample (b)(6) and run (b)(6) sample (b)(6)).Manual pcr curve adjudication of samples (b)(6) (run (b)(6)) and (b)(6) (run (b)(6)) revealed late, but true amplification curve in the fam channel (ct target).Late positive samples can occur due to viral titers in the specimen being at or near the limit of detection of the assay or through environmental or cross contamination introduced during the sample preparation at the customer¿s site.Repeat tests sample (b)(6) (run (b)(6)) and sample (b)(6) (run (b)(6)) pcr curves analysis, revealed no amplification curve in the fam channel (ct target) for neither of the samples.Based on the data and information provided, specimens at or near the assay limit of detection (lod), or environmental or cross contamination, are the most likely causes to explain the customer¿s positive results.However, bd is unable to confirm the exact cause of the issue.Nonetheless, no reagents issue is suspected.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using bd max¿ ct/gc/tv the customer got a false positives for chlamydia.Sample was recollected and rerun and came out negative.No patient impact was reported.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer claims false pos for chalmydia for 2 patient samples; 1-st false pos obtained on 10/03/2022, run # (b)(6); 2-nd false pos obtained on 10/07/2022, run #( b)(6); both samples were re-collected and re-run, both came out neg; repeats were ordered by the doctor; no erroneous results were reported, no unnecessary patient treatments were administered.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD MAX¿ CT/GC/TV
Type of Device
TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS)
2555 blv. du parc techn
quebec
Manufacturer (Section G)
GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS)
2555 blv. du parc techn
quebec
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key15621688
MDR Text Key307115277
Report Number3007420875-2022-00067
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUY
UDI-Device Identifier00382904429706
UDI-Public00382904429706
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K151589
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date05/16/2023
Device Model Number442970
Device Catalogue Number442970
Device Lot Number2137538
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/11/2022
Initial Date FDA Received10/18/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/02/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/15/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/17/2022
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-