• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DUCKWORTH & KENT VITAN; INTRAOCULAR LENS GUIDE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DUCKWORTH & KENT VITAN; INTRAOCULAR LENS GUIDE Back to Search Results
Model Number DK9000
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Scratched Material (3020)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Information unknown/ not provided.Per regulation eu (b)(4) (general data protection regulation), patient identifiers were not collected or recorded and therefore are not available.Date of event: date unknown/ not provided.Expiration date: information not available at the time of this filing.If explanted; give date: not applicable as the material dk9000 is not an implantable device.If explanted; give date: not applicable as the material dk9000 is not an implantable device.Therefore, not explanted.Telephone number: (b)(6).Device manufacture date: information not available at the time of this filing.The intraocular lens (iol) has not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the plunger scratched over the iol (intraocular lens).The lens was almost implanted but the nurse saw that the plunger was not right, it was all over the optic.No additional information was received.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: no physical products were returned for evaluation at the time of investigation.Images were provided.The three images depict the plunger rod of the vitan inserter having overridden the lens while inside the cartridge.No further details can be obtained through the images.Based on the information obtained, the reported issue is confirmed, however no product deficiency or malfunction can be confirmed.It is not known how many times prior to the reported event that the inserter was used and reprocessed.User/handling errors cannot be ruled out as the plunger rod may become bent as a result of handling.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITAN
Type of Device
INTRAOCULAR LENS GUIDE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DUCKWORTH & KENT
7 marquis business centre
royston road
baldock herts
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15621769
MDR Text Key306884895
Report Number3012236936-2022-02617
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MSS
UDI-Device Identifier05050474651494
UDI-Public(01)05050474651494(17)991231(10)0083
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNL
PMA/PMN Number
K191949
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/16/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberDK9000
Device Catalogue NumberDK9000
Device Lot Number0083
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/21/2022
Initial Date FDA Received10/18/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/13/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/17/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-