It was reported that a literature review, titled, shekar, vijay, et al.(2022)."high rate episodes in a dual chamber pacemaker: what is the mechanism?".Pacing clin electrophysiol.2022;45:238-240.Https://doi.Org/10.1111/pace.14430.Reviewed a patient who underwent a dual chamber pacemaker implantation (boston scientific, advantio mri conditional) for symptomatic complete atrioventricular block at an outside institution.A month after implant, the patient was found to have high atrial and ventricular rate episodes during interrogation and referred for further evaluation.On device interrogation, it was found to be in dddr mode, and high frequency low amplitude noise was detected on both atrial and ventricular channels.The atrial high rate episodes triggered inappropriate mode switch.Device diagnostics also revealed high pacing impedance in the atrial and ventricular leads.The atrial lead impedance had increased abruptly (>2000 ohms) and remained elevated.Atrial pacing thresholds were found to be high (2.6 v @0.40 ms).The ventricular lead had an intermittent, increase in impedance (>2000 ohms), while the ventricular threshold was normal.Device diagnostics also revealed automatic switch of minute ventilation (mv) sensing from atrial to ventricular channel.Atrial pacing was programmed to unipolar configuration, and minute ventilation (mv) sensor was switched off, which resulted in elimination of noise and normalization of pacing impedance.Fluoroscopy revealed the incomplete insertion of both atrial and ventricular leads in the header.Atrial lead insertion was more incomplete compared to ventricular lead.It was noted that this explained the impedance trends of both the leads.The noise characteristics were consistent with electromagnetic interference (emi) from unknown source and was suspected to be due to mv oversensing.The device remains implanted.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|