The reported event is inconclusive because no sample was returned for evaluation.The device was used for treatment purposes.As the device was not returned for evaluation it is unknown if it had met relevant specifications or resulted in the reported event.As the sample was not returned for evaluation a specific root cause could not be determined.However, based on the risk document a potential root cause for this failure could be, "material selection, part geometry".The device history record was reviewed and found nothing that could have caused or contributed to the reported event.A label/pack review is not required as a review of the label could not have prevented the reported event.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the device was not returned.
|
It was reported that the ureteral stent was used after flexible ureteroscope holmium laser lithotripsy to maintain ureteral patency and to drain kidney urine.One month after the operation, it was found that the proximal end of the ureteral stent was displaced to the upper end of the ureter and could not be suspended in the renal pelvis.This resulted in poor renal urine drainage and hydronephrosis.As per the analysis and description of the cause of the incident, it was stated that the diameter of the proximal panel circle of the ureteral stent is small, and it is difficult to stably fix it in the renal pelvis.The ureteral stent was removed.No medical intervention was reported.
|