|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Low Test Results (2458)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/12/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A customer from outside the united states reports observation of a falsely-depressed atellica im total hcg (thcg) result for one patient which was discordant relative to repeat testing.The initial result was reported to the physician, and questioned.Repeat testing of the patient, using new and original samples, produced higher results, which were accepted as correct.The interpretation of results section of the atellica im thcg instructions for use states: "results of this assay should always be interpreted in conjunction with patient's medical history, clinical presentation and other findings." siemens is investigating.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer reports observation of a falsely-depressed atellica im total hcg (thcg) result for one patient which was discordant relative to repeat testing.The initial result was reported to the physician, and questioned.Repeat testing of the patient, using new and original samples, produced higher results, which were accepted as correct.There are no allegations of patient harm, changes in treatment, or delays in diagnosis in association with the discordant atellica im thcg result.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Mdr 1219913-2022-00382 was initially filed on 2022-11-3.Additional information, 2023-01-27: siemens has concluded the investigation.A customer from outside the united states reported observation of a falsely-depressed atellica im total hcg (thcg) result for one patient which was discordant relative to repeat testing.On 2022 (b)(6), an initial thcg result of 3.9 iu/l was obtained, and considered lower than expected.The same sample was re-tested on 2022 (b)(6), and produced a much higher thcg result of 1,873 iu/l.A new sample was drawn and tested on 2022 (b)(6), and it produced a result much higher than the assay's reference interval.The higher results were accepted as clinically correct.Quality control results for this assay were within range on both days of testing.Other samples tested for thcg at this time were not questioned.The customer has not expressed any additional concerns with the thcg assay.Siemens did not receive complete trace-file data from the associated atellica im analyzer, so records for instrument reagent handling could not be fully examined.Siemens cannot definitively identify the cause for the observed discordant result, but pre-analytical factors and sample handling issues cannot be ruled out.Based on the investigation, no product problem was identified.Note: in section h6, the codes for investigation findings and investigation conclusion have been updated.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|