STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN_SECUR-FIT STEM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number UNK_JR |
Device Problems
Loss of Osseointegration (2408); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 10/23/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient's left hip was revised.Rep was told that the patient had an 'old' periprosthetic fracture which either healed or partially healed.Nothing further (i.E.Fracture, subsidence, etc) was reported to the rep.A stem, head and liner were revised to another stem, head, and liner.Rep confirmed there are no allegations against the revised head and liner.Rep can provide pictures, and confirmed that no further information will be released by the hospital or surgeon.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reported event: an event regarding loosening involving an unknown securfit stem was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "this patient underwent a revision left cementless total hip arthroplasty for subsidence and loosening of the femoral component.A probable periprosthetic fracture was present the age of which is unknown but it appears healed.I can confirm that the implant showed the above findings since i was able to see an x-ray demonstrating them.Since i do not have an operation report or any office notes, i cannot absolutely confirm that the revision took place but the inquiry summary described the revision.The root cause of revision of the femoral component is multifactorial.It cannot be determined with certainty.In this case the patient may well have had satisfactory fixation of the femoral component which may have then loosened secondary to a periprosthetic fracture.Other causes of femoral loosening include surgical technique factors, and patient factors such as activity level and bmi." product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised.A review of the medical records by a clinical consultant confirmed stem loosening.An old periprosthetic fracture that had healed was observed by the clinician in the provided x-ray image - it is unknown if the periprosthetic fracture occurred while this stryker device was implanted in the patient.The clinician could not determine root cause from the information provided but indicated that "the patient may well have had satisfactory fixation of the femoral component which may have then loosened secondary to a periprosthetic fracture.Other causes of femoral loosening include surgical technique factors, and patient factors such as activity level and bmi." further information such as return of the device, pathology reports, additional pre- and post-operative x-rays and the revision operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.Product surveillance will continue to monitor for trends.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient's left hip was revised.Rep was told that the patient had an 'old' periprosthetic fracture which either healed or partially healed.Nothing further (i.E.Fracture, subsidence, etc) was reported to the rep.A stem, head and liner were revised to another stem, head, and liner.Rep confirmed there are no allegations against the revised head and liner.Rep can provide pictures, and confirmed that no further information will be released by the hospital or surgeon.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|