• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number SIGTRSB60AMT
Device Problems Misfire (2532); Separation Failure (2547)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/17/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
According to the reporter, on a laparotomy side-to-side large intestine anastomosis, after anastomosis, the tip of the suture in the reinforced reload did not come off.The reload also did not come off from the tissue.Both the cartridge and the anvil side were removed from the out front, with suture on the tip with scissors.When the sheet at the tip of the reload was cut, the reload came off the tissue easily.There were no issues with the staple line so the procedure was completed.There was no patient injury.Medtronic's initial evaluation of the incident device found that the reload was partially fired and the interlock was engaged.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical product/s: sigphandle sig power sigphandle handle, serial #:unknown; sigpshell sig power sigpshell control shell, lot #:unknown; unknown egia su unknown endo gia sulu, lot #:unknown; sigadaptstnd sig power sigadaptstnd linear adapter, serial #:unknown.Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the reload was partially fired and the interlock was engaged.Functional testing required the interlock to be overridden and the reload was applied to test media.The reload interlock was tested and found to function properly.It was reported that the reinforcement material did not release from the device as expected after firing.The reported issue was confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The evaluation detected unreported conditions: the device had damage to the cutting edge of the knife blade, and the shipping wedge was damaged.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.Shipping wedge damage may occur if the shipping wedge pull tab is pulled in a lateral fashion towards the distal end of the single use loading unit channel rather than away from the channel or if the loading unit is clamped prior to removal of the yellow shipping wedge.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: failure to completely fire the reload will result in an incomplete cut and/or incomplete staple formation, which may result in poor hemostasis and/or leakage.When positioning the stapler on the application site, ensure that no obstructions, such as clips, are incorporated into the instrument jaws.Firing over an obstruction may result in incomplete cutting action and/or improperly formed staples.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRI-STAPLE 2.0
Type of Device
STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key15823520
MDR Text Key307594277
Report Number1219930-2022-04561
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GDW
UDI-Device Identifier10884521717626
UDI-Public10884521717626
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K173270
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/17/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSIGTRSB60AMT
Device Catalogue NumberSIGTRSB60AMT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/19/2022
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/25/2022
Initial Date FDA Received11/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-