• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC. PORTEX EPIDURAL CATHETERS; CATHETER, CONDUCTION, ANESTHETIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC. PORTEX EPIDURAL CATHETERS; CATHETER, CONDUCTION, ANESTHETIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 100/382/116
Device Problems Material Fragmentation (1261); Device Contamination with Body Fluid (2317)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 09/30/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Udi is unknown.No information has been provided to date.A device history record (dhr) review of the device history records shows there were no observations recorded during manufacture to suggest an issue of this nature would occur with this lot of product.The investigation of the complaint was limited because no sample was returned, visual and functional testing could not be performed.The reported issue could not be confirmed as no product sample was received for evaluation.If the product is returned, the manufacturer will reopen this complaint for further investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was admitted to the institution to undergo a lipoabdominoplasty surgical procedure.Anesthetic block was performed with a 16g tuohy needle, t8 t9, loss of resistance technique, test dose, anesthetic infiltration without intercurrence.Passage of epidural catheter.Needle removal without complications.Afterwards, blood was returned through the catheter, a small indentation of 0.5 cm was made and the catheter was washed with lidocaine with a vessel.Aspiration of the catheter was performed and the return of the anesthetic slightly stained with blood was observed, at this moment the patient made an extension movement of the spine, after which the change in the position of the catheter was noticed and after slight manipulation it was observed that it had broken in the marking "3" of the catheter.An attempt was made to remove it by making a 3 cm incision in the skin over the puncture site to see if it was in the subcutaneous tissue, but nothing was found.The case was discussed with a neurosurgeon and it was decided to proceed with the procedure under general anesthesia and monitor the evolution of the ruptured catheter portion.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PORTEX EPIDURAL CATHETERS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CONDUCTION, ANESTHETIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC.
10 bowman dr.
keene NH 03431
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC.
10 bowman dr.
keene NH 03431
Manufacturer Contact
jim vegel
6000 nathan lane north
minneapolis, MN 55442
MDR Report Key15826058
MDR Text Key303927818
Report Number3012307300-2022-27318
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
PMA/PMN Number
K062005
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/18/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number100/382/116
Device Catalogue Number100/382/116CZ
Device Lot Number4099003
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/25/2022
Initial Date FDA Received11/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/16/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-