A review of the device history record confirmed that the device was manufactured and tested according to relevant procedures, and shipped according to manufacturer's specifications.Patient #225 index procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2018.On (b)(6) 2022 apifix was notified that patient #225 (m.K) had undergone an implant removal surgery.The surgery date and reason for the removal was not provided.The reporter stated that 'there was a lot of suspected metalosis present in patient m.K and some disintegration of the device'.A pathology report for patient m.K showed that there was no infection.Despite multiple attempts to obtain additional information, specifically, the reason for the removal and surgery date, no additional information had been provided.For reasons unknown, the implant was removed with no reported patient harm having occurred.Apifix believes that subjecting a patient to another round of anesthesia and additional surgery carries inherent risks, and in an abundance of caution, apifix is reporting this as an adverse event.Should additional information be made available, apifix will file a follow up mdr.
|