Upon receipt at boston scientific's post market laboratory the sheath was first visually inspected, and no visual abnormalities were found.Next, they functionally tested the sheath by replicating aspiration and the sheath was within specification and showed no air bubbles for each variation of the test.Then, they tested the integrity of the hemostatic valve and found the sheath was within specification for maintaining internal pressure and no leaks were observed.Based on all the available evidence the conclusion is that no problem was detected with the returned device, the reported allegation of air in the device could not be replicated, and no other issues were found with the device.Based on the information provided, there is no evidence that the device was used in a manner inconsistent with the labelled indications/instructions for use (ifu).The ifu states "do not aspirate via the side port if the sheath lumen is occupied (i.E., by the dilator or components of the cryoablation catheter) as the aspiration may draw air across the sheath valve into the polarsheath.", as investigation found no defect with the device, if any air was seen in the sheath the most likely cause would have been use of the device that was contradictory to the provided instructions.
|