As a result, the jada system did not work properly.The patient continued bleeding and had to undergo a hysterectomy [device ineffective].Provider admitted that provider did not know how to use the jada system.Caller states that provider filled fluid into the wrong chamber [wrong technique in device usage process].Case narrative: this spontaneous report was received from a physician via company representative referring to a female patient of unknown age.The patient gave birth at 34 weeks gestation and had pre-eclampsia.The patient's concurrent conditions included uterine atony.The patient's concomitant medications, and drug reactions/allergies were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient and 1 device.On an unknown date in 2022 (reported as "a few months ago"), the patient was started on vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) via an unknown route for abnormal postpartum bleeding (postpartum bleeding) (lot# and expiration date were not reported).It was reported that the physician (also reported as "provider") admitted that the physician did not know how to use the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system).On an unknown date in 2022 (reported as "a few months ago"), the physician "filled fluid into the wrong chamber" (wrong technique in device usage process).As a result, the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) did not work properly.The patient continued bleeding and had to undergo a hysterectomy (device ineffective).It was also reported that the patient did not die.No additional adverse event (ae) or product quality complaint (pqc) were identified.No additional information was known at the time of reporting.The availability of vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was unknown.For vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system), lot number and serial number were not available.Upon internal review, the event of "device ineffective" was determined to be serious as it required intervention.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.
|