• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC EPIDURAL CATHETERIZATION SET; ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC EPIDURAL CATHETERIZATION SET; ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number IPN920769
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problems Discomfort (2330); Inadequate Pain Relief (2388)
Event Date 11/01/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device has not been returned for investigation.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend related events.
 
Event Description
Reported issue: incident occurred on (b)(6) 2022.The epidural analgesia catheter was inserted in the female patient that was giving birth.Insertion done without any difficulty.The catheter was attached as usual with a transparent sterile dressing at the level of the lumbar puncture bridge and attached to the patient's shoulder with a mefix-type dressing.The patient was not agitated, she was not rubbing her back excessively on the bed.Observing the inefficiency of the epidural analgesia 5 hours after insertion, the midwife examined the puncture site searching for a possible leak from the catheter.She discovered a cut of the catheter 30 cm from the tip that is inside patient.I removed the catheter and inserted a new analgesia catheter.There was loss of analgesia and patient discomfort but no part of the catheter was left in the patient, no breach.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Qn#(b)(4).The customer reported the catheter was leaking.The customer returned one opened kit.The epidural catheter was removed and visually examined with and without magnification.Visual examination of the returned catheter revealed the catheter was returned in two pieces.The catheter appears to have been cut.Also, both the proximal and distal ends of the returned catheter pieces appear to be intact.The catheter appears to have been used as biological material can be seen on the inner coils and adhesive on the other extrusion.No other defects or anomalies were observed.A dimensional inspection was performed on the catheter using a ruler.None of the catheter appears to be missing.The catheter is within specification.Functional inspection was performed on the returned sample.A functional leak test was performed per amrq-000017 section 7.5; rev.10 using the returned catheter proximal piece and snaplock assembly with the lab leak tester.No leak was observed.The same test was performed on the returned catheter distal piece with the same results.A device history record review was performed on the epidural catheter with no relevant findings.The ifu for this kit, e-17019-110a; rev.2, was reviewed as a part of this complaint investigation.The ifu cautions the user, "do not alter the catheter or any other kit/set component during insertion, use or removal (except as instructed)." a corrective action is not required at this time as the condition of the sample received indicates unintentional user error caused or contributed to this event.The reported complaint of the catheter leaking could not be confirmed based on evaluation of the sample received.Visual inspection revealed the catheter was returned in two pieces as it appears the catheter had been cut.However, no leaks were detected during the functional inspection of the returned epidural catheter pieces.A device history record review was performed on the epidural catheter with no evidence to suggest a manufacturing related issue.Therefore, based upon the condition of the sample received, unintentional user error caused or contributed to this event.No further action is required at this time.
 
Event Description
Reported issue: incident occurred on (b)(6) 2022.The epidural analgesia catheter was inserted in the female patient that was giving birth.Insertion done without any difficulty.The catheter was attached as usual with a transparent sterile dressing at the level of the lumbar puncture bridge and attached to the patient's shoulder with a mefix-type dressing.The patient was not agitated, she was not rubbing her back excessively on the bed.Observing the inefficiency of the epidural analgesia 5 hours after insertion, the midwife examined the puncture site searching for a possible leak from the catheter.She discovered a cut of the catheter 30 cm from the tip that is inside patient.I removed the catheter and inserted a new analgesia catheter.There was loss of analgesia and patient discomfort but no part of the catheter was left in the patient, no breach.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EPIDURAL CATHETERIZATION SET
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC
morrisville NC
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL CR, A.S.
jamska 2359/47
zdar nad sazavou 591 0 1
EZ   591 01
Manufacturer Contact
effie jefferson
3015 carrington mill blvd
morrisville 27560
9194332672
MDR Report Key15868591
MDR Text Key304345822
Report Number3006425876-2022-01018
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSO
UDI-Device Identifier10801902197631
UDI-Public10801902197631
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K140110
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2024
Device Model NumberIPN920769
Device Catalogue NumberJC-05400-DCS
Device Lot Number71F22E1654
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/07/2022
Initial Date FDA Received11/28/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/21/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/28/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/19/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage A
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
NONE REPORTED.; NONE REPORTED.
Patient SexFemale
-
-