The dignity port was returned with the lumen and lock attached.Visual inspection revealed the distal end of the lock is severely damaged and appears to have been crushed.Closer examination shows marks from an instrument such as a hemostat.It is not known why the lock would have been pinched in this manner or if it occurred during insertion or during device removal.The lumen appears to bend approximately 4.5 cm from the stem but is not kinked as reported.The device flushed and aspirated with no resistance.However, a leak was noted approximately 5 cm from the port stem.Closer inspection of the lumen revealed the leak is coming from a slice approximately 0.2 cm in length.The edges of the slice are smooth, not jagged.This portion of the lumen would have been in the body and not exposed to anything other than fluids.It is possible the lumen was nicked prior to or during insertion, causing a weak spot in the lumen.Over time this weak spot may have opened, causing the issue reported.It cannot be determined when damaged occurred.The device was implanted for 10 months prior to the incident.It is also possible the kink/leak was caused by pinch off.This condition and steps to overcome it are discussed in the instructions for use (ifu).The contract manufacturer conducted a review of the manufacture records for the lot number reported.Their investigation revealed the device was manufactured and inspected according to specification with no non-conformances or abnormalities.The manufacture process includes a sample inspection of tubing to ensure no kinks or other defects and measurement variations are noted.A root cause cannot be determined but is not likely manufacture related.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|