• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD. MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD. MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 125
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 12/02/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Patient #(b)(6) index procedure was performed om (b)(6) 2019.On (b)(6) 2022 apifix was notified that the patient is experiencing 'sharp pains with radiation'.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the device history record confirmed that the device was manufactured and tested according to relevant procedures, and shipped according to manufacturer's specifications.Patient #(b)(6) index procedure was performed om (b)(6) 2019.On (b)(6) 2022 an apifix representative was notified by a patient's father that the patient is 'suddenly experiencing 'sharp pains with radiation'.Apifix followed up with the patient's surgeon requesting additional information, specific to the patient's status.On (b)(6) 2022, the surgeon notified apifix that the issue might be a 'ratchet problem', further noting that "it is very difficult to communicate with the patient and agree on the most logical line of action." apifix has requested recent patient x-rays.No additional information had been provided to date.The risk of pain is a known risk.Pain associated with scoliosis is well described in the literature regardless of having corrective surgery.Pain can also be a transient complaint associated with the surgical procedure or be secondary to device failure, infection/inflammation, curve progression, screw pull-out, loosening, migration, protrusion, and prominence.The event of pain is addressed in the ifu as a warning and as potential risks associated with the mid-c system and spinal surgery generally.This risk of pain has been assessed and found to be acceptable.The reported event may lead to a revision/removal surgery; apifix believes that subjecting a patient to another round of anesthesia and additional surgery carries inherent risks, and in an abundance of caution, apifix is reporting this event.Should additional information be made available, apifix will file a follow up mdr.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On 29-nov-2022, apifix was notified that the patient is scheduled for removal surgery on (b)(6) 2022.Apifix followed up with the distributor (30-nov) to provide updates, if possible, regarding the reason for removal & to provide images from the case and returned product for evaluation.  on (b)(6) 2022, the (index) surgeon notified apifix that a second surgeon would be removing the device, adding that the second surgeon has flex extension x-rays which demonstrate ratchet malfunction.On (b)(6) 2022, the implant was removed from the patient with no further instrumentation; no report of patient harm or complications was received.The device was returned to apifix for further evaluation.Upon completion of that evaluation, the complaint record will be updated and a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Return analysis: the explanted device was returned and was subjected to cleaning, steam sterilizing, and engineering evaluation.The spherical ring of the base was missing upon arrival.It was difficult to turn the control pin and it felt gritty while turning.Once in idle mode the device was able to be shortened as designed.The device was put into ratchet mode and extended.Any movement of the control pin or pole was very challenging.When lengthened and more of the pole shown, tissue remnants were shown.The exact cause of this malfunction could not be investigated because the internal mechanism is sealed by permanent closure (weld), but it is suspected that tissue growth within the device could be the cause because every motion related to the internal mechanism was more challenging than usual.There were no obvious manufacturing or design defects which contributed to the failure.The remaining spherical showed light wear, with minor scratching.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 125
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
alan vaisman
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key15876104
MDR Text Key307989368
Report Number3013461531-2022-00064
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIS
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMID-C 125
Device Catalogue NumberAFS-125-050
Device Lot NumberAF-03-01-19
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/02/2022
Initial Date FDA Received11/29/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/29/2022
11/29/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/18/2022
11/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/10/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age23 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-