• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO BCT SPECTRA OPTIA; SPECTRA OPTIA EXCHANGE SET,EA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO BCT SPECTRA OPTIA; SPECTRA OPTIA EXCHANGE SET,EA Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 12220
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Hemolysis (1886)
Event Date 05/16/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The journal article, 'therapeutic plasma exchange causing (not curing) hemolysis' discusses a case of a patient undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange (tpe).Per the article, at the beginning of the patient's 4th of 7 tpe procedures, the operator noted an altered appearance to the waste plasma being removed.The procedure was immediately discontinued (251 ml of blood with 10 ml of anticoagulant had been processed) without reinfusion of extracorporeal blood.Since only 11 ml of blood had been returned and the clinical status and vital signs of the patient (blood pressure 142/81; pulse 81 beats/minute) were unchanged in the period immediately after discontinuation of the initial procedure, laboratory studies for hemolysis (direct coomb¿s test, lactate dehydrogenase level, haptoglobin level, bilirubin level, etc.) were foregone.The patient identifier is not available at this time.The exchange set is not available for return for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Lot number and expiry are not available at this time.Investigation is in process.A follow up report will be provided.Article citation: graham, b.C., burgstaler, e.A., winters, j.L.Therapeutic plasma exchange causing (not curing) hemolysis.J.Clinapheresis 33(3):393-395 2018.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: since this is a journal published in 2017 without unknown procedural date, the lot number was not requested; therefore, a dhr search could not be conducted for this specific incident.All lots must meet acceptance criteria for release.The authors included three photos in the publication and the findings are as follows: a, plasma demonstrating hemolysis within the cassette tubing.B, cassette tubing from second tpe procedure after switching instruments and reestablishing peripheral vascular access.Note the normal appearing plasma without evidence of hemolysis.C, plasma demonstrating hemolysis collected from the ¿waste¿ plasma bag after discontinuation of the tpe procedure.Centrifugation of the sample failed to demonstrate any red blood cells within the sample per the article, "at the time tpe was initiated, the patient was receiving only glucocorticoids and interferon beta for multiple sclerosis.This tpe was number 4 of 7 planned procedures (tpe was performed every other day [skipping weekends] over 16 days).The three previous procedures had been tolerated well without incident.Per departmental protocol, 1.5 plasma volumes (3034 ml) had been exchanged in the previous procedures utilizing the standard anticoagulant mixture consisting of 1000 ml acid-citrate-dextrose solution a (acda) with 10000 units of heparin at an anticoagulant: blood ratio of 26:1.Standard peripheral venous access utilizing a 16-gauge steel needle for inlet access and a flexible 18- gauge needle for return access in the opposite arm with 12-fr catheters.These parameters from the previous procedures were utilized in the current procedure.Peripheral venous access was difficult to establish with multiple inlet access alarms in the early part of the procedure due to poor flow through the ¿draw¿ line.The patient¿s apheresis nurse vigilantly noted an altered appearance to the initial ¿waste¿ plasma coursing through the pump cassette and into the ¿waste bag¿ (figure 1a).The procedure was immediately discontinued (251 ml of blood with 10 ml of anticoagulant had been processed) without reinfusion of extracorporeal blood.A new apheresis instrument was prepared for the patient, new peripheral venous access was established, and the procedure was restarted and completed without incident (figure 1b).A systematic search for osmotic, thermal, and mechanical causes of hemolysis was undertaken.Hypotonic solutions have been shown to cause osmotic lysis of red cells in the classic experiments conducted by parpart et al.3 in our patient, inspection of the replacement/priming/anticoagulant fluids demonstrated that the standard fluids of isotonic 5% human albumin solution, 0.9% nacl (normal) saline, and acda had been appropriately selected and administered excluding osmotic lysis.No blood warmer was used, and close inspection of the centrifuge unit (by means of manual examination of the centrifuge housing, centrifuge ¿bowl,¿ and associated tubing) for increased temperature was negative excluding thermal causes as the source of hemolysis.Mechanical destruction of red cells in an apheresis instrument is caused by shear forces that exceed 1000¿1500 dynes/cm2.These shear forces can be due to turbulent flow of blood because of kinked/pinched tubing or an improperly loaded centrifuge; pump rollers that are not free-moving secondary to fouling with plasma or albumin can likewise cause mechanical destruction of red cells.In our case, the instrument was examined by the apheresis nurse and one of the authors (e.B.) and revealed no problems with the tubing, centrifuge, or mechanical rollers.Examination of the apheresis cassette, however, revealed an interesting finding: the pre-centrifuge filter within the kit cassette was laden with gross blood clots that occluded the filter (figure 2).In the context of multiple access alarms and difficulty establishing peripheral venous access, these spontaneous blood clots likely formed in the draw line at the needle site¿a conclusion supported by previously successful tpe procedures utilizing the same anticoagulant mixture and ratio.As these aggregates occluded the pre-centrifuge filter, the draw pressure created a state of turbulent flow and shear stress within the filter that resulted in significant red cell hemolysis." root cause: a root cause assessment was performed for this complaint.According to the authors, "in our case, the instrument was examined by the apheresis nurse and one of the authors (e.B.) and revealed no problems with the tubing, centrifuge, or mechanical rollers.Examination of the apheresis cassette, however, revealed an interesting finding: the pre-centrifuge filter within the kit cassette was laden with gross blood clots that occluded the filter.In the context of multiple access alarms and difficulty establishing peripheral venous access, these spontaneous blood clots likely formed in the draw line at the needle site¿a conclusion supported by previously successful tpe procedures utilizing the same anticoagulant mixture and ratio.As these aggregates occluded the pre-centrifuge filter, the draw pressure created a state of turbulent flow and shear stress within the filter that resulted in significant red cell hemolysis." based on the available information a definitive root cause for clotting could not be determined but it is likely due to one or a combination of the possible causes listed below: * use of anticoagulant mixture with heparin at a high anticoagulant: blood ratio of 26:1 which was inadequate to keep the extracorporeal circuit properly anti-coagulated, resulting in the activation of platelets.* activation of platelets as a result of the patient's physiology.Article citation: graham, b.C., burgstaler, e.A., winters, j.L.Therapeutic plasma exchange causing (not curing) hemolysis.J.Clinapheresis 33(3):393-395 2018.
 
Event Description
The journal article, 'therapeutic plasma exchange causing (not curing) hemolysis' discusses a case of a patient undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange (tpe).Per the article, at the beginning of the patient's 4th of 7 tpe procedures, the operator noted an altered appearance to the waste plasma being removed.The procedure was immediately discontinued (251 ml of blood with 10 ml of anticoagulant had been processed) without reinfusion of extracorporeal blood.Since only 11 ml of blood had been returned and the clinical status and vital signs of the patient (blood pressure 142/81; pulse 81 beats/minute) were unchanged in the period immediately after discontinuation of the initial procedure, laboratory studies for hemolysis (direct coomb¿s test, lactate dehydrogenase level, haptoglobin level, bilirubin level, etc.) were foregone.This is a journal published in 2017 without unknown procedural date.A request for specific patient information is not feasible.The exchange set is not available for return for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being filed to provide additional information in e.1, h.6 and h.10.Investigation: since this is a journal published in 2017 without unknown procedural date, the lot number was not requested; therefore, a dhr search could not be conducted for this specific incident.All lots must meet acceptance criteria for release.The authors included three photos in the publication and the findings are as follows: a, plasma demonstrating hemolysis within the cassette tubing.B, cassette tubing from second tpe procedure after switching instruments and reestablishing peripheral vascular access.Note the normal appearing plasma without evidence of hemolysis.C, plasma demonstrating hemolysis collected from the ¿waste¿ plasma bag after discontinuation of the tpe procedure.Centrifugation of the sample failed to demonstrate any red blood cells within the sample investigation is in process.A follow up report will be provided.Article citation: graham, b.C., burgstaler, e.A., winters, j.L.Therapeutic plasma exchange causing (not curing) hemolysis.J.Clinapheresis 33(3):393-395 2018.
 
Event Description
The journal article, 'therapeutic plasma exchange causing (not curing) hemolysis' discusses a case of a patient undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange (tpe).Per the article, at the beginning of the patient's 4th of 7 tpe procedures, the operator noted an altered appearance to the waste plasma being removed.The procedure was immediately discontinued (251 ml of blood with 10 ml of anticoagulant had been processed) without reinfusion of extracorporeal blood.Since only 11 ml of blood had been returned and the clinical status and vital signs of the patient (blood pressure 142/81; pulse 81 beats/minute) were unchanged in the period immediately after discontinuation of the initial procedure, laboratory studies for hemolysis (direct coomb¿s test, lactate dehydrogenase level, haptoglobin level, bilirubin level, etc.) were foregone.The patient identifier is not available at this time.The exchange set is not available for return for evaluation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPECTRA OPTIA
Type of Device
SPECTRA OPTIA EXCHANGE SET,EA
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO BCT
lakewood CO 80215
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO BCT
10810 w. collins ave
lakewood CO 80215
Manufacturer Contact
scot hilden
10810 w. collins ave
lakewood, CO 80215
MDR Report Key15894570
MDR Text Key307897352
Report Number1722028-2022-00386
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GKT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
BK150251
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/01/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number12220
Device Lot NumberNOT PROVIDED
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/07/2022
Initial Date FDA Received12/01/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/09/2023
01/18/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/16/2023
01/27/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age25 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight97 KG
-
-