Device evaluation: the device evaluation for evo-fc-r-20-25-12-e of lot c1386147 could not be completed as the device or photographic evidence of the device was not returned for evaluation lab evaluation: n/a documents review including ifu review: prior to distribution all devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.A review of the manufacturing records of lot c1386147 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue the review of relevant manufacturing records of lot number c1386147 confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred for this work order.The instructions for use, ifu0067 which accompanies this device, it informs the user about the potential complications "additional complications include, but are not limited to: stent misplacement and/or migration".There is no evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.Image review: n/a root cause analysis: a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed to patient condition related, as per instructions for use, stent migration is listed as a potential complication following the placement of this device.Summary: complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.According to the initial reporter, the patient did experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
Device evaluation: the 01x evo-fc-r-20-25-12-e device of lot number c1386147 involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.This file was created in response to a pmcf study ¿mdr2054¿ to capture 01x case of use error for exceeding recommended indwell time resulting in stent migration the device lab evaluation could not be completed as the device, or photographic evidence of the device, was not returned for evaluation.Manufacturing records review: prior to distribution all devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.Instructions for use and/label review: as per the ifu (ifu0067), stent migration is a known potential adverse event associated with gi endoscopy "those associated with gi endoscopy include, but are not limited to: perforation, haemorrhage, aspiration, reflux, vomitting, fever, infection, allergic reaction to medication, hypotension, respiratory depression or arrest, cardiac arrhythmia or arrest." ¿additional adverse events include, but are not limited to: airway compression, allergic reaction to nickel, aortoesophageal fistula and arterioesophageal fistula, chest or retrosternal pain, death (other than due to normal disease progression) dysphagia, edema, erosion or perforation, esophagitis, fistula involving trachea or bronchi or pleural space, food bolus impaction, foreign body sensation or reaction, gas bloat, inadequate stent expansion, intestinal obstruction secondary to migration, mediastinitis or peritonitis, nausea, pain/discomfort, reocclusion, sensitivity to metal components, sepsis, stent misplacement and/or migration, tracheal obstruction, tumour overgrowth, wire entrapment.¿ there is evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.It should be noted that the instructions for use (ifu0067) states the following: ¿the safety and effectiveness of leaving this stent in place, or removing the evolution esophageal stent ¿ fully covered from a benign lesion beyond 8 weeks has not been established.¿.Image review: an image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause analysis: a definitive root cause of use error was identified from the available information.The stent has been left in place for 120 days which is beyond the recommended 56 days (8 weeks).The instructions for use, ifu0067 which accompanies this device, instructs the user that: ¿the safety and effectiveness of leaving this stent in place, or removing the evolution esophageal stent ¿ fully covered from a benign lesion beyond 8 weeks has not been established.It is possible that the user error of the stent being left in place beyond the recommended 8 weeks contributed to the stent migration.Confirmation of complaint: complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.Confirmed quantity of 01x used device.Summary of investigation: according to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.As per the patient casebook, the patient required a new, non-study stent to be placed as treatment for the migration of the evo-fc-r-20-25-12-e stent.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|