|
Model Number ADVANCECE |
Device Problems
Material Deformation (2976); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/02/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
One export advance ce aspiration catheter was intended to be used.There was no damage noted to the packaging.The device was removed from the packaging per ifu with no issues noted.The device was inspected with no issues noted.The device was prepped per ifu with no issues noted.It was reported that the device was damaged.Resistance was not encountered when advancing the device, excessive force was not used during insertion/delivery.It stated that it looked like braid or catheter material had broken through the outerjacket of the distal segment.The patient was reported alive with no injury.Please note that this device (export advance ce) is not marketed in the united states; however, the device is deemed the same as the united states marketed device (export advance).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis: image appears to show the coiled complaint device present in the product shelf carton.The possible area of shaft damage is highlighted in the photo but it is not possible to confirm the nature of the deformation from the photo.Product analysis: device returned coiled in a biohazard bag.One export advance ce aspiration catheter with aspiration line attached, was received for analysis.A kink was noted on the shaft of the aspiration line.Approx 4.5cm of the proximal of the guidewire lumen was torn and deformed.Approx.7mm of the lumen had lifted from the shaft and was protruding outwards.Further deformation was noted along the mid-section of the lumen.It was not possible to load a 0.014 inch guidewire through the lumen due to the deformation noted.The proximal of the guidewire protruded through the tear on the guidewire lumen.The markerband was still present and there was no deformation noted to the tip.No other damage was noted to the remainder of the device.Additional information: the device was not excessively torqued.There was no intervention required due to the event.There was no injury caused to the patient.The damage was noted, after aspiration, during withdrawal of the catheter from the patient at the level of the co-pilot.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: the damage was noticed when the device was withdrawn back to the point of the co-pilot/introducer sheath.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|