• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ACCLARENT, INC. TRUDI PROBE, 0, 5IN; EAR, NOSE, AND THROAT STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ACCLARENT, INC. TRUDI PROBE, 0, 5IN; EAR, NOSE, AND THROAT STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number TDP0005
Device Problem Incorrect Interpretation of Signal (1543)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/30/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The healthcare professional reported that during a primary hybrid functional endoscopic sinus surgery procedure, the trudi probe 0-degree, 5in (tdp0005 / 210310a-pc) was off in accuracy by about 4mm on the trudi navigation system.The registration probe was showing accurate; the registration probe was replaced without resolution.The trudi nav suction device was also replaced and the trudi navigation system showed ¿close to accurate.¿ the trudi probe was replaced and the issue resolved; the procedure continued.There was no report of any patient adverse event.On (b)(6) 2022, additional information was received.The information indicated that when the reported accuracy issue was observed, the icon on the trudi navigation system was green.There was no error message on the trudi nav monitor for the device.The information reported that the device was plugged in after registration.The patient tracker did not move; the patient tracer cable was not under tension in relation to the reported event.Axial computed tomography (ct) image was used as the primary image.Not more than one ct scan was attempted to be used with one device.The information stated that the inaccuracy issue was determined by verifying each instrument on the bridge of the patient¿s nose.There was no ferromagnetic material placed within the trudi zone.It was not known if the crosshairs turned yellow.The emitter pad did not move; the patient did not move.There was no other device¿s shaft in the proximity to an emitter pad¿s transmitter.Based on the additional information received on (b)(6) 2022, the accuracy issue was observed when the icon was green on the trudi system, the event has been deemed reportable as a ¿malfunction.¿.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date as indicated as ¿other¿ in this section as the reason for non-evaluation.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (210310a-pc) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by acclarent, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, acclarent, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report the investigational finding of the returned device.[conclusion]: the healthcare professional reported that during a primary hybrid functional endoscopic sinus surgery procedure, the trudi probe 0-degree, 5in (tdp0005 / 210310a-pc) was off in accuracy by about 4mm on the trudi navigation system.The registration probe was showing accurate; the registration probe was replaced without resolution.The trudi nav suction device was also replaced and the trudi navigation system showed ¿close to accurate.¿ the trudi probe was replaced and the issue resolved; the procedure continued.There was no report of any patient adverse event.On 01-dec-2022, additional information was received.The information indicated that when the reported accuracy issue was observed, the icon on the trudi navigation system was green.There was no error message on the trudi nav monitor for the device.The information reported that the device was plugged in after registration.The patient tracker did not move; the patient tracer cable was not under tension in relation to the reported event.Axial computed tomography (ct) image was used as the primary image.Not more than one ct scan was attempted to be used with one device.The information stated that the inaccuracy issue was determined by verifying each instrument on the bridge of the patient¿s nose.There was no ferromagnetic material placed within the trudi zone.It was not known if the crosshairs turned yellow.The emitter pad did not move; the patient did not move.There was no other device¿s shaft in the proximity to an emitter pad¿s transmitter.The complaint device was returned for evaluation and analysis.The investigation finding is documented below.Investigation summary: a non-sterile trudi probe was received contained in a decontamination pouch.Visual inspection was performed.No appearance of damage was observed.The unit was sent to bwi-htc (haifa technology center) for robot location accuracy testing and magnetic calibration system (magcs) check.The unit failed the magcs calibration check for sensor sensitivity.However, when the unit was tested on the robcs (robotic calibration system) to determine the impact of sensor sensitivity failure on location accuracy; the unit passed for location accuracy, the unit meet the location accuracy specification of < 1 mm root mean square (rms) tool error.Based on the results provided by the bwi-htc team, the reported issue documented in the complaint was not confirmed.Although the unit was calibrated with a faulty dongle, causing failures in sensor sensitivity, the robcs test determined that the sensor accuracy was not affected.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (210310a-pc) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.As part of acclarent quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Calibration with faulty dongles is being addressed through acclarent quality system.No corrective and preventive action (capa) activity is required at this time.Although no conclusion could be reached as to what may have caused or contributed to the event reported, the instructions for use (ifu) contains the following recommendations: before use, confirm the trudi¿ probe¿s location accuracy by checking the displayed position of the trudi¿ probe on several clearly identifiable anatomical structures.If the deviation is significant and is not resolved by repeating the registration of the ct or mri pre-operative scan on the system, do not use the trudi¿ probe.Ensure that device shaft and connectors do not come close to one of the transmitters on the trudi¿ emitter pad.If the shaft or connector is in proximity to a transmitter, location accuracy might be affected.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report that the product was received in the product analysis lab on 27-dec-2022.The returned product is pending evaluation.A supplemental 3500a report will be submitted once the product investigation has been completed.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRUDI PROBE, 0, 5IN
Type of Device
EAR, NOSE, AND THROAT STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ACCLARENT, INC.
31 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ACCLARENT, INC.
31 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
303552-689
MDR Report Key15982639
MDR Text Key306976686
Report Number3005172759-2022-00040
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PGW
UDI-Device Identifier20705031464190
UDI-Public10705031464193
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K193453
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/14/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/10/2023
Device Model NumberTDP0005
Device Catalogue NumberTDP0005
Device Lot Number210310A-PC
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/01/2022
Initial Date FDA Received12/14/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/27/2022
03/14/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/09/2023
03/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/10/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-