Catalog Number P2000 |
Device Problems
Improper Flow or Infusion (2954); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation (2001); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
|
Event Date 11/15/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient's bladder was nicked during surgery.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information will be provided once the investigation has been completed.The device manufacturer date is not known at this time.However, should it become available it will be provided in future reports.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient's bladder was nicked during surgery.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Alleged failure: change in flow rate the failure identified in the investigation is inconsistent with the alleged failure.Probable root cause: not related to fluidsmart, see below: rmf 1261 rev.Ah.Line item 4.Io1 fluid suction force to high/tissue damage severity: s3 (necessitates professional medical or surgical intervention (to prevent permanent impairment) occurrence: o1 (negligible, product contained) filing rationale: based on a review of the risk documentation and the reported information regarding this event, a serious injury report will be filed for the reported serious injury.Manufacture date is not known.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Updating to reference correct fda registration number - 3007495879 - endoscopy (solon).Alleged failure: change in flow rate.The failure identified in the investigation is inconsistent with the alleged failure.Probable root cause: not related to fluidsmart, see below: rmf 1261 rev.Ah.Line item 4.Io1 fluid suction force to high/tissue damage.Severity: s3 (necessitates professional medical or surgical intervention (to prevent permanent impairment).Occurrence: o1 (negligible, product contained).Filing rationale: based on a review of the risk documentation and the reported.Information regarding this event, a serious injury report will be filed for the reported serious injury.Please note, this event was initially determined as a serious injury reportable event due to patient's bladder being nicked during surgery.However, per additional information provided, the device did not cause the incident and there has been nothing that indicated that the machine caused the patient¿s bladder to get nicked.The alleged failure is due to too much suction from the neptune.Due to this, this event is now a malfunction reportable event.Manufacture date is not known.
|
|
Event Description
|
Please note, this event was initially determined as a serious injury reportable event due to patient's bladder being nicked during surgery.However, per additional information provided, the device did not cause the incident and there has been nothing that indicated that the machine caused the patient¿s bladder to get nicked.The alleged failure is due to too much suction from the neptune.Due to this, this event is now a malfunction reportable event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|