• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PERFUSION SYSTEMS DLP AORTIC ROOT ANTEGRADE ANTEGRADE CANNULA; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PERFUSION SYSTEMS DLP AORTIC ROOT ANTEGRADE ANTEGRADE CANNULA; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Model Number 10012
Device Problem Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/17/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during use of a dlp aortic root cannula, it was reported when cannula was removed from patient, it was noted that a small bit of the blue tip of the cannula appeared to be missing.The defect had not been noted prior to its use, but may not have been noticed if it had been there.There was no patient impact associated with this event.Medtronic received additional information that the tip was not obstructed.The tip did not detach from the cannula body.The cannula was not heated or cooled prior to use.One of the clinicians mentioned that the device was damaged in-situ when the surgeon used an aortic hole punch to create the hole to sew on the vein graft, catching the tip in the punch.The damage was not caused by a defect in the cannula.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic received additional information that the tip was not located, so it is unclear where the broken part went.However it was reported that if the tip was damaged by the aortic hole punch, it would be likely be removed from the patient inside the punch.There was no intervention or other action taken, as it was not observed to be missing the part of the tip until it was removed from the patient at the end of the procedure.Conclusion: after investigation at medtronic, complaint is confirmed for damage to and portion missing from the blue cannula body tip.Inspection of the tip shows there is damage and a portion of it is missing.Additional inspection under magnification observed what appears to be smooth cut/tear where the piece is missing.It is unknown what may have caused this occurrence.The user is instructed to test the cannula prior to use by pulling back the introducer needle and reinserting it into the cannula tip.This damage could have occurred prior to use during the testing of the cannula.The device history record could not be reviewed as no lot number was provided.Complaints received from december 2021 through april 2023 for similar model numbers were reviewed and showed no trends warranting escalation related to this occurrence.There were no adverse patient effects as a result of this incidence.Medtronic has made its supplier aware and will continue to monitor for future occurrences and trends.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: visual inspection shows a section of the tip is missing.Reason for return was confirmed.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DLP AORTIC ROOT ANTEGRADE ANTEGRADE CANNULA
Type of Device
CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
PERFUSION SYSTEMS
7611 northland dr
brooklyn park MN 55428
Manufacturer (Section G)
PERFUSION SYSTEMS
7611 northland dr
brooklyn park MN 55428
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key16033335
MDR Text Key308205359
Report Number2184009-2022-00450
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K790565
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/11/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number10012
Device Catalogue Number10012
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/02/2022
Initial Date FDA Received12/22/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/15/2023
04/18/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/13/2023
05/11/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-