|
Model Number DIU150 |
Device Problem
Mechanical Problem (1384)
|
Patient Problem
Discomfort (2330)
|
Event Date 10/10/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Weight and ethnicity: unknown; requested but not provided.Device evaluation: the device was not returned at the manufacturing site; therefore, product testing could not be performed, and the customer¿s reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured according to specifications.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search revealed that no similar complaint for this production order number has been received.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) was explanted during a secondary procedure due to "mechanical complications".The issue was observed during a post-operative examination.The symptoms the patient experienced was decreased visual acuity (va).Another johnson and johnson iol was implanted as replacement (different model, dib00, same diopter of 19.0).No incision enlargement, suture, or vitrectomy was required.There was no delay in procedure.No further information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: dec 28, 2022.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut in half.The lens was cleaned and, no issues that could contribute to or cause the complaint issues were identified.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue ¿hm-sub-optimal results¿ and ¿dc-mechanical issues¿ was not confirmed.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected data: upon further review it was noted that "g4" field which should have been populated with "no" was inadvertently left blank on the initial mdr; therefore, the information has been corrected in this supplemental mdr report and the following fields have been updated accordingly: section g4: combination product: no.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|