This report is based on information provided by a philips remote service engineer (rse) personnel and has been investigated by the philips complaint handling team.Philips received a complaint on the patient information center ix (pic ix) indicating that the device did not alarm during the time in question.Results of functional testing indicated that per the audit logs, the pic ix system did alarm and functioned as expected.Based on the information available and the testing conducted we were unable to replicate the reported problem.The reported problem was not confirmed.Based on the information available and results of additional analysis, no further action is necessary at this time.The clinical assessment states the audit trail indicated the device alarmed as expected; therefore, a failure to alarm did not occur and the device did not cause or contribute to the patient injury.The device was confirmed to be operating per specifications and no failure was identified.The investigation concludes that no further action is required at this time.
|