Catalog Number 23-2005 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/06/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an unspecified procedure, the accu-pass direct tip broke off.The broken piece was retrieved from the operation site.It is unknown how the procedure was completed or if there was a surgical delay.No further complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a hip arthroscopy, the accu-pass direct tip broke off.The broken piece was retrieved from the patient with an arthroscopic grasper.The procedure was completed with a non-significant surgical delay using an arthrex competitor device.No further complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H10 h3, h6: a device deficiency was not identified, and the root cause of the reported event could not be determined since the device was not returned for evaluation.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states without clinically relevant patient-specific supporting documentation, a thorough medical investigation could not be performed.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the device and the reported event.A visual evaluation showed the device was not returned in any original packaging.The hook at the end of the pickled flat wire is missing.The handle, at the distal screws on one side, is cracked.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states without clinically relevant patient-specific supporting documentation, a thorough medical investigation could not be performed.The complaint was confirmed and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factor that could have contributed to the reported event include an application of unintended inappropriate or excessive force to the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|