CONCORD MANUFACTURING 2008T HEMODIALYSIS SYSTEM W/BIBAG; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 190766 |
Device Problem
Thermal Decomposition of Device (1071)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/30/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity.
|
|
Event Description
|
A user facility reported to fresenius technical service (ts) that a fresenius 2008t hemodialysis (hd) machine was having issues during chemical disinfection.The chemical disinfection could not be completed due to a flow error alarm that was occurring.A fresenius field service technician (fst) was called on site to repair the 2008t machine.The hd machine was placed into a full rinse, and it began alarming intermittently with a flow error alarm.The fst pulled the hydraulic cage out for inspection and found that valve 108 was damaged by leaking fluid (concentrate solution), and the connection cable was corroded.The fst replaced valve 108 and the corroded cable, but the flow error alarm continued to occur.The fst then noticed that valve 30 was leaking from the inlet tubing, which may have been responsible for the intermittent flow error.However, valve 30 was replaced and the flow error alarm continued.Upon further inspection, the fst found that the flow pressure was measuring very low, at 29.97 psi.Per the fst, the flow pressure should be between 35 and 36 psi.The fst readjusted the flow pressure to 35.48 psi and placed the machine back into rinse.The full rinse cycle was then completed without any issue.Further testing was performed and the machine was placed back into a chemical disinfection, and again the machine began alarming with a flow error alarm.The fst found that valve 39 was the cause of the alarm.The fst stated there was a split in the center of the valve.The fst replaced the damaged valve and re-rinsed the machine.Following this repair, the machine went through testing and passed all treatment tests three times.After functional testing was completed, the machine was returned to service.There was no patient involvement associated with the reported event.It is unknown if any parts were available for evaluation.However, photos were provided by the fst for review.Upon review of the photos, thermal damage was identified on a machine component.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Correction: d9 additional information: h3 plant investigation: no parts were returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.However, an on-site evaluation was performed by a fresenius field service technician (fst).In addition, photos of the damaged component were provided for review.A records review was performed on the reported serial number.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no non-conformances, or any associated rework identified during the manufacturing process which could be related to the reported event.In addition, the device history record (dhr) review confirmed the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was able to confirm the reported failure mode.The fst identified thermal damage on a machine component, as depicted in the provided photos.Therefore, the complaint event was confirmed.
|
|
Event Description
|
A user facility reported to fresenius technical service (ts) that a fresenius 2008t hemodialysis (hd) machine was having issues during chemical disinfection.The chemical disinfection could not be completed due to a flow error alarm that was occurring.A fresenius field service technician (fst) was called onsite to repair the 2008t machine.The hd machine was placed into a full rinse, and it began alarming intermittently with a flow error alarm.The fst pulled the hydraulic cage out for inspection and found that valve 108 was damaged by leaking fluid (concentrate solution), and the connection cable was corroded.The fst replaced valve 108 and the corroded cable, but the flow error alarm continued to occur.The fst then noticed that valve 30 was leaking from the inlet tubing, which may have been responsible for the intermittent flow error.However, valve 30 was replaced and the flow error alarm continued.Upon further inspection, the fst found that the flow pressure was measuring very low, at 29.97 psi.Per the fst, the flow pressure should be between 35 and 36 psi.The fst readjusted the flow pressure to 35.48 psi and placed the machine back into rinse.The full rinse cycle was then completed without any issue.Further testing was performed and the machine was placed back into a chemical disinfection, and again the machine began alarming with a flow error alarm.The fst found that valve 39 was the cause of the alarm.The fst stated there was a split in the center of the valve.The fst replaced the damaged valve and re-rinsed the machine.Following this repair, the machine went through testing and passed all treatment tests three times.After functional testing was completed, the machine was returned to service.There was no patient involvement associated with the reported event.It is unknown if any parts were available for evaluation.However, photos were provided by the fst for review.Upon review of the photos, thermal damage was identified on a machine component.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|