COOK INC BIWIRE NITINOL HYDROPHILIC WIRE GUIDE; OCY ENDOSCOPIC GUIDEWIRE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Peeled/Delaminated (1454); Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/27/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Customer name, address, and phone: (b)(6).This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported, the biwire nitinol hydrophilic wire guide was broken during the procedure.Review of the attached images show the coating had peeled away from the wire.Another device of the same type was used to complete the procedure.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Additional information regarding event details and patient anatomy has been requested but is not available at this time.
|
|
Event Description
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.Event description: as reported, the biwire nitinol hydrophilic wire guide was broken during the procedure.Review of the attached images show the coating had peeled away from the wire.Another device of the same type was used to complete the procedure.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A visual inspection of the returned device was conducted.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record (dhr), the instructions for use (ifu), and quality control procedures.One device was returned in an open package.Upon inspection the coating was observed to be peeling.The returned complaint device was reviewed by the supplier who noted skive/cut damage in a proximal to distal orientation 118.1 to 129.2cm from the distal tip, exposing the metallic core wire.The specimen presented coating damage 24 cm to 34cm from the distal tip.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The evidence from the complaint file, device history record, complaint history and supplier investigation indicates that the complaint device was manufactured to specification as well as other items in the lot or similar devices in the field or in house.A review of relevant quality control documents was conducted.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: instructions for activating hydrophilic coating, the hydrophilic coating on the wire guide is activated by immersion in sterile water or sterile saline solution.1.Prior to using the wire guide, fill a syringe with sterile water or sterile water or sterile saline solution and attach it to the flushing port on the wire guide.2.Inject enough solution to wet the wire guide surface entirely.This will activate the hydrophilic coating.Cook has concluded a cause for the complaint could not be established; clinical/procedural factors could not be ruled out.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|