• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ADVANCED STERILIZATION PRODUCTS STERRAD® 100NX STERILIZER 2-DR; STERRAD® EQUIPMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ADVANCED STERILIZATION PRODUCTS STERRAD® 100NX STERILIZER 2-DR; STERRAD® EQUIPMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 10104-002
Device Problems Device Emits Odor (1425); Environmental Particulates (2930)
Patient Problem Unspecified Respiratory Problem (4464)
Event Date 12/09/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).A field service engineer was dispatched to the customer site.The adapter converter, catalytic converter, and oil mist filter were replaced to resolve the mist/vapor and odor/smells issues.Unit meets specifications and was returned to service.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no issues relating to the failure mode were noted.The involved unit met manufacturer specifications at the time of release.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by advanced sterilization products, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, advanced sterilization products, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Asp complaint ref #: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
A customer reported an event of a ¿mist¿ or vapor and an ¿intense smell¿ or odor emitting from the sterrad® 100nx sterilizer, and a health care worker (hcw) reported experiencing a respiratory reaction described as a burning in the throat.The respiratory reaction disappeared when the hcw left the room, and no medical treatment was required.Lastly, the hcw status was reported as ¿in good health¿.An asp field service engineer was dispatched to assess the unit onsite.The respiratory reaction resolved without medical or surgical intervention and was assessed to be a minor injury; however, this event is being reported as a malfunction report subsequent to a previous serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On 31-jan-2023, asp received additional information and became aware of omission error in the initial medwatch report.Correction: the involved sterrad® 100nx was not returned to service.The field service engineer could not verify the reported mist/vapor or odor/smells issues and confirmed that the sterrad® 100nx unit was within specifications after service.However, the customer stated the reported issues were not resolved, and the sterrad® 100nx was deactivated for additional assessment.Further unit testing could not replicate the reported mist/vapor or odor/smells issues; however, additional components were subsequently replaced, including the vacuum pump, vacuum valve and o-ring.Asp complaint ref #: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3: asp investigation summary: the investigation included a review of the device history record (dhr), trending analysis of the mist/haze and odor/smells issues, and system risk analysis (sra).¿ trending analysis of the mist/vapor and odor/smells issues for the sterrad® 100nx unit was reviewed for the prior six months from the event date, and no significant trend was observed.¿ review of risk documentation shows the risk for exposure to toxic or corrosive material to be "low." no parts were available for further analysis.The assignable cause of the mist/vapor and odor/smell is potentially due to the adapter converter, catalytic converter, and oil mist filter, as well as the vacuum pump, vacuum valve and o-ring.The asp field service engineer replaced the parts and confirmed the sterrad® 100nx met functional specifications after service.The issues were resolved and the system was returned to service.Asp will continue to track and trend this issue.Asp complaint ref #: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STERRAD® 100NX STERILIZER 2-DR
Type of Device
STERRAD® EQUIPMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ADVANCED STERILIZATION PRODUCTS
33 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ADVANCED STERILIZATION PRODUCTS
33 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
gabriela mclellan
33 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
9495030264
MDR Report Key16072765
MDR Text Key308269947
Report Number2084725-2022-00352
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MLR
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K071385
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number10104-002
Device Catalogue Number10104-002
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/09/2022
Initial Date FDA Received12/29/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/31/2023
06/13/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/01/2023
06/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/01/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-