I placed a jada system but bleeding was still occurring/ did the jada device stop control the bleeding? no [device ineffective].Case narrative: this spontaneous report was received from a physician referring to a female patient of unknown age.The patient's medical history included pregnancy, caesarean section (c-section).The patient's concomitant medications, and drug reactions/allergies were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient and 1 device.The physician reported that on (b)(6) 2022 the patient had postpartum bleeding after a c-section.There was no bleeding at all in the abdomen however, vaginal bleeding started an hour after the c-section.The physician placed a vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) via vaginally (lot# and expiration date were not reported) for postpartum bleeding (postpartum haemorrhage) but bleeding was still occurring (device ineffective).It was reported that the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was not removed and was not reinserted for any reason.The patient had sought medical attention and treatment was given.The patient was currently in interventional radiology.The physician reported that they were trying to localize the vascular source of bleeding and perform an arterial embolization.The physician wanted to know if the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) should be kept in place after the embolization was completed.No additional information was provided at the time of reporting.It was reported that vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was still in place in patient at the time of reporting.Upon internal review, the event of device ineffective was determined to be serious as it required intervention.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.(b)(4).
|