• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V
Device Problem Separation Problem (4043)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned and evaluated, and the customer¿s allegation was confirmed; water tightness was lost due to a cut on the connecting tube.In addition to coating peeling on the connecting tube (maximum width 4mm or more), the evaluation findings included the following: the distal end had a burn, the adhesive on the bending section cover had a chip, due to wear of the angle wire, the bending angle in the up direction did not meet the standard value; due to damage of the channel tube, forceps could not be inserted smoothly, the light guide (lg) bundle had breakage, part of the connecting tube had fallen off, the video connector case was dirty and had a scratch, the electrical contact of the video connector was dirty, the video connector had a scratch, the lg connector had a scratch, the video cable connector had a scratch, the universal cord had a scratch, the up/down plate had a scratch, the angulation lever had a scratch, the grip had a scratch, the control unit had a scratch, the lg cover glass was dirty, the investigation is ongoing, and a supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation or if any additional information is provided by the user facility.
 
Event Description
The customer reported to olympus that while using the uretero-reno videoscope, there was leakage in the insertion section.There was no patient harm associated with the event.The device was returned and evaluated, and the coating of the image guide serpentine was found to be peeling off.This mdr is being submitted to capture the reportable malfunction found during the device evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been over 9 years since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation, a definitive root cause could not be established.The suggested phenomenon was presumed to have been due to stress, handling or other factors.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8 061
JA  961-8061
Manufacturer (Section G)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16093658
MDR Text Key308668983
Report Number3002808148-2023-00055
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170340321
UDI-Public04953170340321
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K072957
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/18/2022
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/18/2022
Initial Date FDA Received01/04/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/13/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/06/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-