• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS LUCERA ELITE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS LUCERA ELITE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number TJF-Q290V
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Pancreatitis (4481)
Event Date 11/19/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled "efficacy and safety of one-stage eus-fna and bile duct metal stent placement for pancreatic cancer with obstructive jaundice".Eus-fna is a useful and safe procedure for diagnosing biliary pancreatic disease.Biliary drainage by ercp is performed for treatment purposes in patients with obstructive jaundice.This time, we investigated a case in which ercp was performed following eus-fna, and placement of a bile duct metal stent was attempted in the same session.¿methods¿ from october 2019 to july 2022, the subjects were 15 patients with suspected obstructive jaundice due to pancreatic cancer based on blood and imaging tests at our hospital (age 46-86 years (average 73 years), 13 males, 2 females).Gf-uct260 and tjf-q290v scopes were used.Pentazocine was used as an analgesic, and midazolam was used as a sedative.After specimen collection by fna, rapid cytology was performed, followed by biliary metal stent placement by ercp.The items to be examined were (1) disease breakdown, (2) eus-fna procedure details, (3) ercp procedure details, (4) complications, (5) implementation time, (6) quantity used of analgesics/sedatives.¿results¿ (1) there were 13 cases of pancreatic cancer (11 cases of head, 2 cases of body) and 2 cases of autoimmune pancreatitis.(2)puncture was performed in 14 cases (1 case was skipped due to involvement of ipmc), the number of punctures was 1-5 times (average 2.4 times), and the puncture route was transgastric in 2 cases and transduodenal in 12 cases.A 22g needle was used in 12 cases and a 25 needle in 2 cases.Rapid cytological diagnosis was class iv or better in 12 cases of pancreatic cancer, and class ll in 2 cases of autoimmune pancreatitis.(3) bile duct intubation was successful in all cases.Biliary metal stents were placed in 12 patients, and nasobiliary drainage tubes were placed in 3 patients.(4) mild post-ercp pancreatitis developed in 2 of the 15 patients, but was relieved by conservative treatment.No eus-fna complications were observed.(5) eus-fna took 20-70 minutes (average 43 minutes), ercp took 10-50 minutes (average 22 minutes), and total administration time was 40-100 minutes (average 74 minutes).(6) pentazine doses ranged from 15 to 22.5 mg (mean 17 mg), and midazolam doses ranged from 3 to 9 mg (5.7 mg).Conclusion one-stage eus-fna and biliary metal stent placement can be safely performed without lowering the procedural success rate.Type of adverse events/number of patients: mild post-ercp pancreatitis n=2.This literature article requires 2 reports.The related patient identifiers are as follows: (b)(6) (gf-uct260), (b)(6) (tjf-q290v).This medwatch report is for patient identifier (b)(6).There is no report of any olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this study.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provided additional information from the author and to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.New information added to the following fields: b5 and h6.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since no product malfunction was reported.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, it was presumed that the reported event is an accident or a complication associated with a surgical procedure using the subject device.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Event Description
In the medical opinion of the author, the olympus device did not cause malfunction nor the adverse events reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS LUCERA ELITE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16106240
MDR Text Key306877687
Report Number9610595-2023-00236
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberTJF-Q290V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/08/2022
Initial Date FDA Received01/05/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/13/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-