Model Number RD10R-SP06X-000 |
Device Problem
Defective Device (2588)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/06/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A preliminary risk assessment was completed on 12-19-2022 resulting in the determination that the severity of this issue would call for a mdr.While the customer reported no harm to the patient or significant delay in procedure there is the possibility of damage to healthy tissue.Out of abundance of caution an mdr will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
On december 7th, 2022 a clinical specialist received an email from a customer.The email stated that a depth electrode was not used during surgery due to a bent tip.According to the customer, there was no impact to the patient and there was no signigicant delay in surgery as a result of this issue.
|
|
Event Description
|
On december 7th, 2022 a clinical specialist received an email from a customer.The email stated that a depth electrode was not used during surgery due to a bent tip.According to the customer, there was no impact to the patient and there was no signigicant delay in surgery as a result of this issue.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A preliminary risk assessment was completed on (b)(6) 2022 resulting in the determination that the severity of this issue would call for a mdr.While the customer reported no harm to the patient or significant delay in procedure there is the possibility of damage to healthy tissue.Out of abundance of caution an mdr will be filed.Updated 1-12-2023.The product was returned for evaluation.The alleged complaint was confrimed and found that the elecctrode tip was bent.As part of the product evalutaion, the stylet was removed from the electrode and examined.The stylet pulled easily from the electrode tubing and showed no signs of bending or any other damamge.When fully inserted back into the electrode the stylet lessened the bend.However when the stylet was removed the bend was present at a lesser degree.The cause and time of the damage to the electrode could not be confirmed and no root cause could be identified.The risk assessment concluded that the caluclated occurrence remains "alap" (as low as possible) and no futher action is needed at this time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|