• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AEROGEN LTD AEROGEN SOLO NEBULISER SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AEROGEN LTD AEROGEN SOLO NEBULISER SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number AG-AS3200-US
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem Pulmonary Edema (2020)
Event Date 11/30/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Paediatric respiratory therapist was giving 12ml/hr continuous dosing to an 8 month old paediatric patient and was causing pulmonary edema.The aerogen solo was placed on the dry side of the heater on a neonatal circuit when it should have been placed closer to the patient on the inspiratory limb as the dry side of the heater and diameter of the circuit causes significant rainout sending more moisture to the lungs.The order was for 5 mg of albuterol an hour via cnts, however they ran the pump at 12ml/ hour in error.The rate plus the increased rainout fluid overloaded the lungs.The patient subsequently made a full recovery.Aerogens complaint team are in continued follow up with the initial reported for additional information on the event.The device has already been discarded and is not available for return to aerogen.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Aerogen have taken the appropriate measures to review and investigate the complaint received.Aerogen have requested further information from the reporting healthcare worker to determine further details on the event and had requested the return of the device, however, the initial reporter indicated device was disposed of.A review per aerogen's 'field correction/removal procedure' was completed based on this complaint received which may pose a risk to patients.Based on the nature of the complaint, and current investigation in progress it has been concluded that no field correction or removal is required by aerogen at this time.This will be reviewed as investigation progresses and if any further information becomes available to aerogen which may impact the previous no fsca determination, the review and conclusion will be documented within the subsequent report.
 
Event Description
Paediatric respiratory therapist was giving 12ml/hr continuous dosing to an 8 month old paediatric patient and was causing pulmonary edema.The aerogen solo was placed on the dry side of the heater on a neonatal circuit when it should have been placed closer to the patient on the inspiratory limb as the dry side of the heater and diameter of the circuit causes significant rainout sending more moisture to the lungs.The order was for 5 mg of albuterol an hour via cnts, however they ran the pump at 12ml/ hour in error.The rate plus the increased rainout fluid overloaded the lungs.The patient subsequently made a full recovery.Aerogens complaint team are in continued follow up with the initial reported for additional information on the event.The device has already been discarded and is not available for return to aerogen.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Aerogen have taken the appropriate measures to review and investigate the complaint received.Aerogen have requested further information from the reporting healthcare worker to determine further details on the event and had requested the return of the device, however, the initial reporter indicated device was disposed of.A review per aerogen's 'field correction/removal procedure' was completed based on this complaint received which may pose a risk to patients.Based on the nature of the complaint, and current investigation in progress it has been concluded that no field correction or removal is required by aerogen at this time.This will be reviewed as investigation progresses and if any further information becomes available to aerogen which may impact the previous no fsca determination, the review and conclusion will be documented within the subsequent report.No additional information was received and the device was not available for return, therefore aerogen have completed the investigation with information available and no device returned.Clinical assessment: rain-out is usually condensation of humidified gas and to a lesser extent aerosolised drug that deposits as droplets within the breathing circuit.Clinicians often prefer to place the nebuliser at the dry side of the humidifier for a variety of reasons including less rain-out at the wye, as per the current incident.From the available evidence, it is possible that continuous albuterol delivery through a heated humidified circuit could lead to increased rain-out in the ventilator circuit.This may have contributed to the patient impact observed that manifested clinically as pulmonary edema.Pulmonary 3 edema can develop from increased pressure in the microcirculation of the lungs as seen with sustained hypoxia.It can't be discounted that clinical deterioration may have occurred anyway.In the absence of additional information, no further assumption can be drawn on the impact of the aerogen device in the current incident and no root cause can be determined.Based on investigations completed no further actions are determined by aerogen at this time, and aerogen will continue to monitor complaints received, the occurrence rating and severity of the risk as per aerogens quality management system.Risk assessment: risk assessment has been completed to summarize the risk analysis conducted per aerogen's risk management procedures and en iso 14971.Analysis of the aerogen ltd risk management documentation solo shuma sha99-118 identifies the risk of "incorrect (high flow) setting for syringe type selected on the pump" as a result of no or incomplete drug delivery to the patient based on the event description for this complaint.This type of risk would likely result in inconvenience or temporary discomfort to patient/caregiver.The primary conclusion of this risk assessment indicates that continuous albuterol delivery through a heated humidified circuit could lead to increased rain-out in the ventilator circuit.This may have contributed to the patient impact observed that manifested clinically as pulmonary edema.The reported positioning of the aerogen device at the dry side of the humidifier is considered on-label for aerogen devices.In addition, there are no customer complaints directly related to this issue.Market feedback will continue to be monitored through the aerogen customer complaints process.No further action is required based on this risk assessment completed as per aerogen's risk management procedures and en iso14971" application of risk management for medical devices".Based on the information received, there will be no new protective measures introduced or no new risks or additional harms being introduced because of this assessment.The device was not returned for investigation.Therefore, based on assessments completed to date and in the absence of the device for testing, no further assumption can be drawn on device function.The hcp confirmed the order was for 5 mg of albuterol an hour via cnts and they ran the pump at the maximum 12ml/ hour as stated in the aerogen solo instructions for use (30- 674 rev l), rather than determining the required flow for the correct dose of the medication required for the patient.Based on investigations completed no further actions are determined to be required by aerogen at this time, and aerogen will continue to monitor complaints received, the occurrence rating and severity of the risk as per aerogen's quality management system.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Aerogen have taken the appropriate measures to review and investigate the complaint received.Aerogen have requested further information from the reporting healthcare worker to determine further details on the event and had requested the return of the device, however, the initial reporter indicated device was disposed of.A review per aerogen's 'field correction/removal procedure' was completed based on this complaint received which may pose a risk to patients.Based on the nature of the complaint, and current investigation in progress it has been concluded that no field correction or removal is required by aerogen at this time.This will be reviewed as investigation progresses and if any further information becomes available to aerogen which may impact the previous no fsca determination, the review and conclusion will be documented within the subsequent report.Follow up report 1: update fields.No additional information was received and the device was not available for return, therefore aerogen have completed the investigation with information available and no device returned.Clinical assessment: rain-out is usually condensation of humidified gas and to a lesser extent aerosolised drug that deposits as droplets within the breathing circuit.Clinicians often prefer to place the nebuliser at the dry side of the humidifier for a variety of reasons including less rain-out at the wye, as per the current incident.From the available evidence, it is possible that continuous albuterol delivery through a heated humidified circuit could lead to increased rain-out in the ventilator circuit.This may have contributed to the patient impact observed that manifested clinically as pulmonary edema.Pulmonary 3 edema can develop from increased pressure in the microcirculation of the lungs as seen with sustained hypoxia.It can't be discounted that clinical deterioration may have occurred anyway.In the absence of additional information, no further assumption can be drawn on the impact of the aerogen device in the current incident and no root cause can be determined.Based on investigations completed no further actions are determined by aerogen at this time, and aerogen will continue to monitor complaints received, the occurrence rating and severity of the risk as per aerogens quality management system.Risk assessment: risk assessment has been completed to summarize the risk analysis conducted per aerogen's risk management procedures and en iso 14971.Analysis of the aerogen ltd risk management documentation solo shuma sha99-118 identifies the risk of "incorrect (high flow) setting for syringe type selected on the pump" as a result of no or incomplete drug delivery to the patient based on the event description for this complaint.This type of risk would likely result in inconvenience or temporary discomfort to patient/caregiver.The primary conclusion of this risk assessment indicates that continuous albuterol delivery through a heated humidified circuit could lead to increased rain-out in the ventilator circuit.This may have contributed to the patient impact observed that manifested clinically as pulmonary edema.The reported positioning of the aerogen device at the dry side of the humidifier is considered on-label for aerogen devices.In addition, there are no customer complaints directly related to this issue.Market feedback will continue to be monitored through the aerogen customer complaints process.No further action is required based on this risk assessment completed as per aerogen's risk management procedures and en iso14971" application of risk management for medical devices".Based on the information received, there will be no new protective measures introduced or no new risks or additional harms being introduced because of this assessment.The device was not returned for investigation.Therefore, based on assessments completed to date and in the absence of the device for testing, no further assumption can be drawn on device function.The hcp confirmed the order was for 5 mg of albuterol an hour via cnts and they ran the pump at the maximum 12ml/ hour as stated in the aerogen solo instructions for use (30- 674 rev l), rather than determining the required flow for the correct dose of the medication required for the patient.Based on investigations completed no further actions are determined to be required by aerogen at this time, and aerogen will continue to monitor complaints received, the occurrence rating and severity of the risk as per aerogen's quality management system.Update on the 12th of january: follow up report 2 submitted for the addition of investigation codes.The report has been updated for the following fields, b4,g6,h2 and h6.
 
Event Description
Paediatric respiratory therapist was giving 12ml/hr continuous dosing to an 8 month old paediatric patient and was causing pulmonary edema.The aerogen solo was placed on the dry side of the heater on a neonatal circuit when it should have been placed closer to the patient on the inspiratory limb as the dry side of the heater and diameter of the circuit causes significant rainout sending more moisture to the lungs.The order was for 5 mg of albuterol an hour via cnts, however they ran the pump at 12ml/ hour in error.The rate plus the increased rainout fluid overloaded the lungs.The patient subsequently made a full recovery.Aerogens complaint team are in continued follow up with the initial reported for additional information on the event.The device has already been discarded and is not available for return to aerogen.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AEROGEN SOLO NEBULISER SYSTEM
Type of Device
AEROGEN SOLO
Manufacturer (Section D)
AEROGEN LTD
galway business park
dangan
galway, H91EH 6C
EI  H91EH6C
Manufacturer (Section G)
AEROGEN LTD
galway business park
dangan
galway, H91EH 6C
EI   H91EH6C
Manufacturer Contact
thelma marley
galway business park
dangan
galway, H91EH-6C
EI   H91EH6C
MDR Report Key16128913
MDR Text Key306985479
Report Number3003399703-2022-21459
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CAF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K070642
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberAG-AS3200-US
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/14/2022
Initial Date FDA Received01/10/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/14/2022
12/14/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/24/2023
01/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age8 MO
-
-