Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.The lot number was reviewed for complaint trend, nonconforming report and capa.Devices met specification prior to release and no trends were noted.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
As reported to coloplast, though not verified, legal representative stated the patient with this device experienced stress urinary incontinence and acute urinary retention.Along with the sling device implant, the patient had a revision of previously placed (unknown) transobturator tape device, laparoscopy with lysis of adhesions, and cystoscopy.Intraoperative findings noted the previous device could not be identified and removed, adhesions were seen along the area of each vaginal fornix trans lateral of the mid urethra.Adhesions were released successfully.Patient had complete explantation of the sling device with replacement of new sling device and cystoscopy.Intraoperative findings noted the device folded completely in half at the midline.
|