It was reported that the burr became stuck in the lesion.The target lesion was located in the severely calcified proximal left anterior descending artery.A 1.50mm rotapro was selected for use.During procedure, it was noted that the rotation speed suddenly increased during ablation, and then the stall has turned on.The burr stopped rotating and it was confirmed that it got stuck.The burr was removed by cutting the drive shaft and was retrieved using a guide extension catheter.The device was completely removed from the patient's body and the procedure was completed with the device.The physician thought that the drive shaft might have been separated that caused the rotation to stop and the burr to get stuck.There was no patient injury.
|
It was reported that the burr became stuck in the lesion.The target lesion was located in the severely calcified proximal left anterior descending artery.A 1.50mm rotapro was selected for use.During procedure, it was noted that the rotation speed suddenly increased during ablation, and then the stall has turned on.The burr stopped rotating and it was confirmed that it got stuck.The burr was removed by cutting the drive shaft and was retrieved using a guide extension catheter.The device was completely removed from the patient's body and the procedure was completed with the device.The physician thought that the drive shaft might have been separated that caused the rotation to stop and the burr to get stuck.There was no patient injury reported.
|
Device evaluated by mfr: returned product consisted of the rotapro atherectomy device.The advancer, drive shaft, handshake connections, sheath, coil, and burr were visually and microscopically examined.Inspection of the device found that the coil was stretched and broken and that the sheath was separated near the burr housing strain relief in accordance with the reported events indicating that the device was cut.There were no other detachments or separations identified.Due to the damage to the coil and sheath, further functional testing of the burr catheter was not able to be performed.Further functional testing of the advancer was performed by attempting to rotate the drive shaft, and the drive shaft was able to be rotated.A test burr catheter was connected to the advancer and used for analysis.When the rotapro advancer was connected to the rotapro console control system and the knob switch [ablation button] was pressed, the advancer was able to reach and maintain optimal rpm using a test burr catheter.Product analysis confirmed the reported separation, as the sheath and coil were separated as indicated in the reported events.The reported stall and device becoming stuck in the lesion were unable to be confirmed as the advancer was able to reach and maintain optimal rpm with a test burr catheter, and clinical circumstances were unable to be replicated.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.
|