• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 05/26/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Harima et al 2022 - comparison of duodenal stenting and gastrojejunostomy for duodenal obstruction with biliary obstruction.The present study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between dus and gj in patients with double obstruction who underwent biliary stenting.The present study further aimed to analyze the risk factors associated with survival time and time to recurrent biliary obstruction (trbo) dus was performed using evolution duodenal stent; 22-mm diameter,was performed either with an open or laparoscopic approach based on the description of performing surgeons.Biliary stenting was performed with the ptbd approach, ercp approach or eus-bd approach based on the description of the performing physicians.For the ptbd approach, an uncovered 10-mm-diameter sems (epic biliary stent; boston scientific) was placed after temporary external drainage.For the ercp approach, a covered or an uncovered 10-mm-diameter sems was placed, and when eus-guided hepaticogastrostomy combined with antegrade stenting (eus-hgas) was performed, an uncovered 10-mm-diameter sems (zilver stent; cook medical or niti- s large cell sr slim delivery; taewoong medical) and a dedicated 8-fr plastic stent were placed.This complaint was opened to capture stent migration.As per clinical input 'require intervention/additional procedures.' 84 underwent dus.Age 72.Male, n 39(46.4%).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) # k163468.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) # k163468.Device evaluation: the device evaluation for evolution duodenal device of unknown lot could not be completed as the device or photographic evidence of the device was not returned for evaluation.This file is related to (b)(4) (3001845648-2023-00035), (b)(4) (3001845648-2023-00037), (b)(4) (3001845648-2023-00038), and (b)(4) (3001845648-2023-00039).(b)(4) was opened to capture stent migration.Manufacturing records: prior to distribution all devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.Manufacturing records review could not be completed as the lot number is unknown.Review historical data: historical data was not reviewed as the lot number is unknown.Instructions for use and/label the instructions for use, ifu0053 which accompanies this device, states ¿additional complications include but are not limited to: pancreatitis, intestinal perforation, pain, inadequate expansion, stent misplacement and/or migration, tumour ingrowth or overgrowth, stent occlusion, ulcerations, pressure necrosis, necrosis of the luminal mucosa, septicaemia, foreign body sensation, bowel impaction, death (other than due to normal disease progression).There is no evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.Root cause analysis: a definitive root cause could not be determined however a possible root cause can be attributed to known potential complications.The instructions for use lists stent migration as a potential complication following the placement of this device.Summary of investigation: according to the literature study one complication of stent migration occurred.Confirmed quantity of 1 device, confirmed used.The patients required intervention investigation findings concludes a definitive root cause could not be determined however a possible root cause can be attributed to known potential complications.The instructions for use lists stent migration as a potential complication following the placement of this device.Complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
This supplemental report is being submitted due to completion of the investigation on the 11-apr-2023.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED
Type of Device
MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
sinead o'leary
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
MDR Report Key16205796
MDR Text Key307701160
Report Number3001845648-2023-00036
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/11/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date05/26/2022
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/21/2022
Initial Date FDA Received01/19/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/21/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/09/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-