• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. LEAD MODEL 304

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. LEAD MODEL 304 Back to Search Results
Model Number 304-20
Device Problems Corroded (1131); Fracture (1260); Device Contamination with Body Fluid (2317); Naturally Worn (2988)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/21/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Livanova usa, inc.Submits this report to comply with 21 c.F.R.Part 803, the medical device reporting regulation, based on information that livanova has obtained, but may not have been able to investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.This report does not constitute an admission, or a conclusion by fda or anyone else, that the device, livanova, or livanova's employees caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any "defects¿ or "malfunctions¿.These words are incorporated into the fda 3500a medwatch form by the fda, and livanova objects to their use.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was referred for a full revision.Programming history database was reviewed for this patient's generator, which showed high lead impedance.Patient later went into surgery and high impedance was seen during pre-op checks.It is unknown if they attempted pin re-insertion before replacing the generator.And only had a generator replacement.Impedance was on the higher end but still within normal limits.Patient was later seen in clinic where impedance was high again with low output current.The patient is being referred for x-rays.X-rays have not been reviewed by manufacturer to date.Product return attempt will not be made for explanted generator, as listed facility is a no return site.No known additional relevant surgical intervention has occurred to date.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that the patient underwent a revision surgery where the lead was replaced.The explanted product has not been received into product analysis to date.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
The explanted lead was received into product analysis.Analysis has not been completed to date.
 
Event Description
Lead pa was later completed.The lead assembly was returned for analysis due to lead fracture, which was confirmed in product analysis.During the visual analysis of the 1st portion, the ring coil appeared to be broken at end of portion, the coil break mate was not returned.The broken end appeared dark, pitted and rounded.Due to the condition of the coil end the fracture mechanism could not be ascertained.In addition, coil1 of 3rd portion was found to be broken.The coil break end is dark and pitted; the coil break mate end is dark, pitted and shows signs of metal dissolution.Due to the condition of the coil ends the fracture mechanism could not be ascertained.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed during the functional analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.Abrasions and fluid were observed in several places in the inner and outer tubing of the lead.No other anomalies were noted.Other than the conditions noted above, and the abraded openings, the condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.Note that since a portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 304
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
dana sprague
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2816672681
MDR Report Key16234133
MDR Text Key309029748
Report Number1644487-2023-00081
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/19/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date12/16/2016
Device Model Number304-20
Device Lot Number3497
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/28/2022
Initial Date FDA Received01/24/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/17/2023
03/07/2023
04/17/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/10/2023
03/30/2023
04/19/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/18/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
EMPTY
Patient Age16 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-