The event was reviewed by a roche medical doctor and a roche pathologist who concluded: "triple-negative breast cancer (tnbc) is a highly complex, heterogeneous disease and historically has limited treatment options.It has a high probability of disease recurrence and rapid disease progression despite adequate systemic treatment" (valencia ga, rioja p, morante z, ruiz r, fuentes h, castaneda ca, vidaurre t, neciosup s, gomez hl.Immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a literature review and new advances.World j clin oncol.2022 mar 24;13(3):219-236.Doi: 10.5306/wjco.V13.I3.219.Pmid: 35433291; pmcid: pmc8966508).The prognosis for triple-negative breast cancer with recurrence and metastasis is even poorer.The treatment for this patient would have been palliative rather than curative as her cancer had recurred multiple times and at the time immunotherapy was considered.Given this poor prognosis, it is difficult to draw a conclusion that the results of this single pd-l1 contributed to the patient's death as she has been shown to have triple-negative breast cancer that recurred locally and then metastasized.Though the patient may have been eligible for additional therapy based on these results, the clinical impact on this patient is difficult to determine.The probability of this therapy adding significantly to her quality or duration of life is not supported by the literature or the clinical picture presented (ademuyiwa, f.O., gao, f., street, c.R.Et al.A randomized phase 2 study of neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab in triple-negative breast cancer (tnbc) - nci 10013.Npj breast cancer 8, 134 (2022).Https://doi.Org/10.1038/s41523-022-00500-3).Roche initiated a recall on 18 november 2022 (recall number: z-0907-2023 (res#9119)) due to unacceptable, light staining with some ventana pd-l1 (sp142) lots.Following the instructions in the notification from roche regarding the recall, the tissue blocks from (b)(6) 2020 underwent repeat testing by the customer.Further investigation is ongoing to determine if this issue is related to this recall.The microscopic slides of all the stained slides have been requested for review.
|
A customer from the united kingdom alleged discrepant results with the ventana pd-l1 (sp142) assay for one patient.In (b)(6) 2020, biopsies were taken on three locations and pdl1 testing was performed on all 3 samples.All were reported negative.In (b)(6) 2022, all 3 samples from (b)(6) 2020 were pdl1 re-tested.Two 2 remained negative, 1 was positive.
|
Roche observed unacceptable, light staining with some lots of ventana pd-l1 (sp142) lots, during internal comparison studies.Light staining affects the borderline of positive versus negative test results.An on-going investigation has determined the root cause is related to variability in the selection of antibody concentration in raw materials, affecting specific ventana pd-l1 (sp142) assay lots made with the impacted raw materials.Lot g06715 is not part of the us recall as this lot is not marketed or distributed in the us.
|